On Friday, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) held a ceremony in the Great Hall of the People in Tiananmen Square to commemorate the late leader Hu Yaobang (胡耀邦), who rose to prominence in the 1980s. Friday marked Hu's 90th birthday. Among the 300 participants were three members of the Politburo Standing Committee: the party's top disciplinary official Wu Guanzheng (吳官正), Vice President Zeng Qinghong (曾慶紅) and Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶).
Observers agree that this was the Chinese government's way of restoring Hu's stature and reputation. But the question is, what does it really mean for China? Since Hu is remembered as a liberal, is this a prelude to more liberalization and reforms in China?
Unfortunately, few people believe that this is the Chinese leadership's intention. While redeeming Hu is unlikely to bring any substantive change for the time being, the move by itself did raise some eyebrows. After all, for the past two decades, Hu's legacy has become a sensitive subject. Chinese student began rallying in Tiananmen Square in the early summer of 1989 in commemoration of Hu. The rallies evolved into large-scale protests against corruption, inflation and political repression -- all problems that continue to bedevil the Chinese government -- and finally, to the bloody crackdown on June 4 that shocked the world.
To this day, the CCP's official stance on the June 4 crackdown is that it was correct to order the suppression of the so-called "counter-revolutionary political turmoil."
Under the circumstances, it is not surprising that several members of the Politburo Standing Committee -- including Wen -- reportedly raised concerns when Chinese President Hu Jintao (
His insistence on holding the event came as something of a surprise. After all, in the two years since he took power, he has been known for tightening up controls within China, including control of the media.
If the move is intended neither to overturn the government's current stance on the Tiananmen massacre, nor to pave the way for any major liberal reforms, then there's only one plausible explanation for why Hu Jintao held the event. Clearly, he wanted to soften his hardline image and win over the support of the CCP's liberal factions -- many of whom continue to revere Hu Yaobang's memory.
Hu Yaobang is remembered as a man who was ahead of his time in supporting liberal reforms. But he was also revered for rehabilitating many people in the post-Cultural Revolution era. Many family members and relatives of those rehabilitated now all hold high positions within the party. For these reasons Hu Yaobang came back into the spotlight, even after being removed from power in 1987 and criticized for having "bourgeois" tendencies.
Symbolic and superficial gestures of this sort can never truly win peoples' hearts. Only with genuine reform and liberalization can the Chinese leadership genuinely win support that will withstand the test of time.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS