On Friday, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) held a ceremony in the Great Hall of the People in Tiananmen Square to commemorate the late leader Hu Yaobang (胡耀邦), who rose to prominence in the 1980s. Friday marked Hu's 90th birthday. Among the 300 participants were three members of the Politburo Standing Committee: the party's top disciplinary official Wu Guanzheng (吳官正), Vice President Zeng Qinghong (曾慶紅) and Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶).
Observers agree that this was the Chinese government's way of restoring Hu's stature and reputation. But the question is, what does it really mean for China? Since Hu is remembered as a liberal, is this a prelude to more liberalization and reforms in China?
Unfortunately, few people believe that this is the Chinese leadership's intention. While redeeming Hu is unlikely to bring any substantive change for the time being, the move by itself did raise some eyebrows. After all, for the past two decades, Hu's legacy has become a sensitive subject. Chinese student began rallying in Tiananmen Square in the early summer of 1989 in commemoration of Hu. The rallies evolved into large-scale protests against corruption, inflation and political repression -- all problems that continue to bedevil the Chinese government -- and finally, to the bloody crackdown on June 4 that shocked the world.
To this day, the CCP's official stance on the June 4 crackdown is that it was correct to order the suppression of the so-called "counter-revolutionary political turmoil."
Under the circumstances, it is not surprising that several members of the Politburo Standing Committee -- including Wen -- reportedly raised concerns when Chinese President Hu Jintao (
His insistence on holding the event came as something of a surprise. After all, in the two years since he took power, he has been known for tightening up controls within China, including control of the media.
If the move is intended neither to overturn the government's current stance on the Tiananmen massacre, nor to pave the way for any major liberal reforms, then there's only one plausible explanation for why Hu Jintao held the event. Clearly, he wanted to soften his hardline image and win over the support of the CCP's liberal factions -- many of whom continue to revere Hu Yaobang's memory.
Hu Yaobang is remembered as a man who was ahead of his time in supporting liberal reforms. But he was also revered for rehabilitating many people in the post-Cultural Revolution era. Many family members and relatives of those rehabilitated now all hold high positions within the party. For these reasons Hu Yaobang came back into the spotlight, even after being removed from power in 1987 and criticized for having "bourgeois" tendencies.
Symbolic and superficial gestures of this sort can never truly win peoples' hearts. Only with genuine reform and liberalization can the Chinese leadership genuinely win support that will withstand the test of time.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS