The marginalization of Taiwan's economy is upon us, with the opening up of trade with China, and the gradual drain of Taiwan's capital, talent and technology across the Taiwan Strait. Over time, this drain has increased in both volume and speed.
In 2001, the year that the government adopted its "proactive liberalization" policy toward trade with China, notebook computer production peaked in Taiwan. At the time it was No. 1 in the world, accounting for 89 percent of global production, compared with the 4 percent produced in China.
China's hold on production capacity shot up to 82 percent last year, leaving Taiwan trailing with a 16 percent share. This year the last notebook production line closed. The speed with which China has replaced Taiwan in this regard is quite breathtaking.
On Oct. 24, shares of notebook maker Compal fell NT$0.9, closing at NT$29.6. Some reports say that notebook original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are running 6 percent profit margins. Only 6 percent? This is certainly cause for concern, but it is also the necessary outcome of a situation in which Taiwanese businesses have been falling over themselves to get a foothold in China, together with the government's lack of effective management. Given this, can the stock market recover?
The stock market closed that day at 5,717 points, representing a fall of 6.8 percent from the end of last year. This is pretty miserable compared to figures from South Korea, India and Japan, which have shown increases of 30 percent, 29 percent and 14 percent, respectively.
Marginalization is a process in which a small economic entity is absorbed and eventually extinguished by a larger one through integration. It is a slow process which can, at times, include periods of apparent rejuvenation, which offer some hope. In all, however, the smaller entity's life force is in perpetual decline.
Taiwan's economic growth started to slide in the 1990s, with bank reserves recording single-digit expansion. Both phenomena were part and parcel of the marginalization process. In 1996, former president Lee Teng-hui (
The pro-unification voices in the media claim that the root cause of the decline in the stock market is a lack of confidence, and that the most important thing now is to regain it. But is this really true? In all honesty, a lack of confidence is but a symptom of the problem and not the cause.
Take a situation in which an elderly man with anemia stumbles and breaks his arm. The fact that he stumbled and injured himself is just the result of the fact that he is anemic, and therefore unsteady on his feet.
Following the same principle, the poor fortunes of Taiwan's stock market in recent years and its significant fall on Oct. 17 cannot be put down to a loss of investor confidence or concerns over avian flu. The real reason is that Taiwanese businesses migrated to China, taking our capital and draining the economy of its lifeblood. The reason pro-unification academics and the media are blaming the market's decline on a lack of investor confidence stems from their identification with China. They have whipped up this public discourse in an effort to cover up their desire to realize their dream of unification.
On Oct. 24, an article entitled "Government Taking Last Stand to Restore Investor Confidence" appeared in a local Chinese-language newspaper. The article claimed that Premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) knows full well that stimulating the economy is key to the cross-strait problem, and has therefore decided to take a more proactive approach and open up channels of communication with higher-level policy makers. But, we are also aware that this technique of creating dissent and division within the ranks is just another way in which the pro-unification factions are conducting their "war without limits." I hope this divide-and-conquer strategy will not be allowed to succeed.
The article called for eight-inch wafer and LCD plants to be set up in China, for the 40 percent ceiling on investment in China to be raised and for other restrictions on investment in China to be removed. If these demands are really met, they will fly in the face of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) policies of preferring no investment in China if it cannot be effectively managed, and of reducing reliance on China.
It will also go to show that businessmen are the ones making government policy, and that the country is being governed by the media. This "last stand" is destined to end in a victory for pro-unification elements and the defeat of Taiwan. It will be a battle for our country. I ask everyone to be on their guard, because we don't want to see Taiwan routed.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS