The marginalization of Taiwan's economy is upon us, with the opening up of trade with China, and the gradual drain of Taiwan's capital, talent and technology across the Taiwan Strait. Over time, this drain has increased in both volume and speed.
In 2001, the year that the government adopted its "proactive liberalization" policy toward trade with China, notebook computer production peaked in Taiwan. At the time it was No. 1 in the world, accounting for 89 percent of global production, compared with the 4 percent produced in China.
China's hold on production capacity shot up to 82 percent last year, leaving Taiwan trailing with a 16 percent share. This year the last notebook production line closed. The speed with which China has replaced Taiwan in this regard is quite breathtaking.
On Oct. 24, shares of notebook maker Compal fell NT$0.9, closing at NT$29.6. Some reports say that notebook original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are running 6 percent profit margins. Only 6 percent? This is certainly cause for concern, but it is also the necessary outcome of a situation in which Taiwanese businesses have been falling over themselves to get a foothold in China, together with the government's lack of effective management. Given this, can the stock market recover?
The stock market closed that day at 5,717 points, representing a fall of 6.8 percent from the end of last year. This is pretty miserable compared to figures from South Korea, India and Japan, which have shown increases of 30 percent, 29 percent and 14 percent, respectively.
Marginalization is a process in which a small economic entity is absorbed and eventually extinguished by a larger one through integration. It is a slow process which can, at times, include periods of apparent rejuvenation, which offer some hope. In all, however, the smaller entity's life force is in perpetual decline.
Taiwan's economic growth started to slide in the 1990s, with bank reserves recording single-digit expansion. Both phenomena were part and parcel of the marginalization process. In 1996, former president Lee Teng-hui (
The pro-unification voices in the media claim that the root cause of the decline in the stock market is a lack of confidence, and that the most important thing now is to regain it. But is this really true? In all honesty, a lack of confidence is but a symptom of the problem and not the cause.
Take a situation in which an elderly man with anemia stumbles and breaks his arm. The fact that he stumbled and injured himself is just the result of the fact that he is anemic, and therefore unsteady on his feet.
Following the same principle, the poor fortunes of Taiwan's stock market in recent years and its significant fall on Oct. 17 cannot be put down to a loss of investor confidence or concerns over avian flu. The real reason is that Taiwanese businesses migrated to China, taking our capital and draining the economy of its lifeblood. The reason pro-unification academics and the media are blaming the market's decline on a lack of investor confidence stems from their identification with China. They have whipped up this public discourse in an effort to cover up their desire to realize their dream of unification.
On Oct. 24, an article entitled "Government Taking Last Stand to Restore Investor Confidence" appeared in a local Chinese-language newspaper. The article claimed that Premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) knows full well that stimulating the economy is key to the cross-strait problem, and has therefore decided to take a more proactive approach and open up channels of communication with higher-level policy makers. But, we are also aware that this technique of creating dissent and division within the ranks is just another way in which the pro-unification factions are conducting their "war without limits." I hope this divide-and-conquer strategy will not be allowed to succeed.
The article called for eight-inch wafer and LCD plants to be set up in China, for the 40 percent ceiling on investment in China to be raised and for other restrictions on investment in China to be removed. If these demands are really met, they will fly in the face of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) policies of preferring no investment in China if it cannot be effectively managed, and of reducing reliance on China.
It will also go to show that businessmen are the ones making government policy, and that the country is being governed by the media. This "last stand" is destined to end in a victory for pro-unification elements and the defeat of Taiwan. It will be a battle for our country. I ask everyone to be on their guard, because we don't want to see Taiwan routed.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS