As China marked the 60th anniversary of Taiwan's recovery from Japan with an unprecedented high-profile celebration, and invited some pro-China groups from Taiwan as examples to support its claim to the nation, it did not forget to bully Taiwan by depriving it of one more diplomatic ally.
On the one hand, Beijing responded to the pan-blue camp through its high-profile celebration of the so-called Retrocession on Oct. 25. But at the same time, it bought Taiwan's diplomatic ally Senegal, in an effort to further undermine the nation's diplomatic efforts and marginalize Taiwan in the international community.
This two-pronged attack, targeting Taiwan on the domestic and international fronts, is designed to destroy the legitimacy of the nation's existence and force it to eventually accept the idea of "one country, two systems."
China has made every effort to oppress and unify Taiwan, and has even forged the history of the "retrocession." It has been repeatedly pointed out that when Japan finally surrendered at the end of World War II in 1945, the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) troops came to Taiwan to accept its surrender under General Douglas MacArthur's General Order No. 1. At that time, all forces north of 16o latitude in Vietnam also surrendered to former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石). Therefore, Taiwan was later occupied by -- rather than sovereignty transferred to -- ? the KMT government.
In the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan merely announced an abandonment of its claims on Taiwan. This was the correct thing for the defeated Japan to do in the circumstances. First, the Qing dynasty had ceded Taiwan to Japan in perpetuity after the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895. As a result, the ownership of Taiwan is completely unrelated to China. Next, although Japan was defeated in the war, it was not defeated by China. At that time, most of China was occupied by Japanese troops, and the government only ruled a small area in the country's southwest. As the KMT could hardly protect itself, how was it able to liberate Taiwan from Japan? In other words, the defeat of Japan was a result of US attacks and the two atomic bombs. The retrocession of Taiwan was a result of US actions, and as President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has pointed out, it did not constitute a return to China.
The KMT is nothing more -- or less -- than a foreign overlord in Taiwan. The fact that Taiwan was released from Japanese rule had nothing to do with the KMT, and under its dictatorial rule, Taiwan suffered the White Terror and the 228 Incident in which much of its intellectual elite was destroyed. What right does such a government, its hands still covered in Taiwanese blood, have to talk about the retrocession of Taiwan?
The establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 set China on a path quite separate from that of Taiwan. The divergent historical development of these two countries China's celebration of Retrocession totally absurd. And as China's leadership, joined by pan-blue politicians, celebrated, China's policy of repression against Taiwan did not soften, even for a moment. Even on the very day of the celebrations, China smilingly announced its coup in depriving Taiwan of a diplomatic ally.
According to Taiwan's ambassador in Senegal, China dangled a carrot of US$200 million, along with assistance in the development of mineral resources and construction of a tunnel beneath the river separating Senegal and Gambia, a deal worth over US$2 billion. China was clearly willing to disregard the cost, clear evidence of what Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade later said: in the pursuit of national interests, there can be no friendships.
Taiwan now only has 25 diplomatic allies, but China is willing to do everything within its power to bring this number down to zero. Taiwan's position has even been undermined in APEC, an economic and commerce forum with no bearing on issues of national sovereignty. Not only is Taiwan's president not allowed to attend, even the compromise solution of sending the legislative speaker has been rejected. But the most tragic thing is that even as China acts in this barbarous way, pan-blue camp politicians still refuse to take Taiwan's side in the argument.
Not only do they not protest, they have also accused the government of incompetence. Oct. 25, 1945, was simply a day on which Taiwan exchanged one tyrannical regime for another. Our children should be taught to remember that whatever else this day represents, it was most certainly not retrocession.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS