As China marked the 60th anniversary of Taiwan's recovery from Japan with an unprecedented high-profile celebration, and invited some pro-China groups from Taiwan as examples to support its claim to the nation, it did not forget to bully Taiwan by depriving it of one more diplomatic ally.
On the one hand, Beijing responded to the pan-blue camp through its high-profile celebration of the so-called Retrocession on Oct. 25. But at the same time, it bought Taiwan's diplomatic ally Senegal, in an effort to further undermine the nation's diplomatic efforts and marginalize Taiwan in the international community.
This two-pronged attack, targeting Taiwan on the domestic and international fronts, is designed to destroy the legitimacy of the nation's existence and force it to eventually accept the idea of "one country, two systems."
China has made every effort to oppress and unify Taiwan, and has even forged the history of the "retrocession." It has been repeatedly pointed out that when Japan finally surrendered at the end of World War II in 1945, the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) troops came to Taiwan to accept its surrender under General Douglas MacArthur's General Order No. 1. At that time, all forces north of 16o latitude in Vietnam also surrendered to former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石). Therefore, Taiwan was later occupied by -- rather than sovereignty transferred to -- ? the KMT government.
In the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan merely announced an abandonment of its claims on Taiwan. This was the correct thing for the defeated Japan to do in the circumstances. First, the Qing dynasty had ceded Taiwan to Japan in perpetuity after the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895. As a result, the ownership of Taiwan is completely unrelated to China. Next, although Japan was defeated in the war, it was not defeated by China. At that time, most of China was occupied by Japanese troops, and the government only ruled a small area in the country's southwest. As the KMT could hardly protect itself, how was it able to liberate Taiwan from Japan? In other words, the defeat of Japan was a result of US attacks and the two atomic bombs. The retrocession of Taiwan was a result of US actions, and as President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has pointed out, it did not constitute a return to China.
The KMT is nothing more -- or less -- than a foreign overlord in Taiwan. The fact that Taiwan was released from Japanese rule had nothing to do with the KMT, and under its dictatorial rule, Taiwan suffered the White Terror and the 228 Incident in which much of its intellectual elite was destroyed. What right does such a government, its hands still covered in Taiwanese blood, have to talk about the retrocession of Taiwan?
The establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 set China on a path quite separate from that of Taiwan. The divergent historical development of these two countries China's celebration of Retrocession totally absurd. And as China's leadership, joined by pan-blue politicians, celebrated, China's policy of repression against Taiwan did not soften, even for a moment. Even on the very day of the celebrations, China smilingly announced its coup in depriving Taiwan of a diplomatic ally.
According to Taiwan's ambassador in Senegal, China dangled a carrot of US$200 million, along with assistance in the development of mineral resources and construction of a tunnel beneath the river separating Senegal and Gambia, a deal worth over US$2 billion. China was clearly willing to disregard the cost, clear evidence of what Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade later said: in the pursuit of national interests, there can be no friendships.
Taiwan now only has 25 diplomatic allies, but China is willing to do everything within its power to bring this number down to zero. Taiwan's position has even been undermined in APEC, an economic and commerce forum with no bearing on issues of national sovereignty. Not only is Taiwan's president not allowed to attend, even the compromise solution of sending the legislative speaker has been rejected. But the most tragic thing is that even as China acts in this barbarous way, pan-blue camp politicians still refuse to take Taiwan's side in the argument.
Not only do they not protest, they have also accused the government of incompetence. Oct. 25, 1945, was simply a day on which Taiwan exchanged one tyrannical regime for another. Our children should be taught to remember that whatever else this day represents, it was most certainly not retrocession.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS