A picture of US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Chinese Defense Minister Cao Gangchuan (
Rumsfeld and Cao were standing at attention and saluting, Rumsfeld with hand over heart and Cao with hand to the visor of his cap, as a band played their national anthems to welcome Rumsfeld to China in his first visit since taking office in 2001.
They were standing at a 90o angle to one another, Cao facing forward and Rumsfeld to the right. They were not back-to-back, as they might have been if they were adversaries, nor were they side-by-side as they would have been as allies. Rather, they were canted away from each other.
Until now, the Bush administration, preoccupied with the campaign against terror, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Israeli-Palestine conflict, has neglected US relations with China, the rising power of Asia and a potential future adversary.
That began to change last June when Rumsfeld took part in the Shangri-La gathering of civilian and military defense leaders in Singapore. That was followed by a visit to China last month by Admiral William Fallon, who leads the US Pacific Command from his headquarters in Hawaii, and by Rumsfeld this month. US President George W. Bush will travel to China in the middle of next month.
In substance, the US leaders have repeatedly expressed skepticism over China's expanding military power. They have, however, toned down the rhetoric compared with the aggressive, even belligerent, tenor of the administration's early days in office. Today, the administration seems to have inserted the proverbial mailed fist into a velvet glove.
In his address to the Shangri-La conference, Rumsfeld raised China's military spending, its expanding missile force and its ability to project military power.
"Since no nation threatens China," Rumsfeld said, "one must wonder, why this growing investment? Why these continuing large and expanding arms purchases? Why these continuing robust deployments?"
Fallon, during his trip to China, carried that a bit further, according to US officers. He sought to deter China's potential military threat by quietly reminding its leaders that the US had the capability and resolve to help defend its interests in Asia, including the defense of Taiwan.
At the same time, Fallon balanced that stance by proposing new military exchanges with China, inviting Chinese officers to observe US military exercises and proposing that US officers make reciprocal visits to China.
During his visit to China this month, Rumsfeld evidently sought to influence rising young leaders of China, addressing the Central Party School where party officials are trained and the Academy of Military Science, which educates young officers in the People's Liberation Army.
"As I look at all of you," he told the students at the school, "it occurs to me that in many ways China's future depends on decisions you will make as your country's next generation of leaders."
He asked them to consider: "What kind of future do you envision? What role will you have in helping the Chinese people achieve the political and economic benefits to which they aspire?"
"What future will you help bring for China as a constructive partner in the international system?" he continued. "When the China of tomorrow comes, what will you tell your children and your great grandchildren of the role you played during your lives in helping to build it?"
Rumsfeld said that forging good relations between China and the US "will require both cooperation and candor." Repeating much of what he had said in Singapore, Rumsfeld pointed to the need for more Chinese transparency in military spending, missile deployments and weapons purchases.
"Many countries with interests in the [Asia-Pacific] region are asking questions about China's intentions," he said. "Clarity would generate greater certainty in the region."
Cao, perhaps inadvertently, answered the question about China's intentions. At a press conference, he said China wanted to be treated as the US' equal.
"We believe," he said, "both China and the United States are big powers and very influential countries."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS