China's "united front" campaign against Taiwan moved into new territory when Beijing marked Retrocession Day yesterday. Over decades , China has ignored this day, but this year Beijing invited members of Taiwan's opposition parties and senior Chinese leaders to take part in three days of festivities.
When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was in power, Retrocession Day was a big event in Taiwan, but after the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) took the presidency, this changed. The new government's interpretation is that Oct. 25 signifies no more than the end of the Sino-Japanese War, and is not related to Taiwan's sovereignty. For this reason, commemorative activities in Taiwan were much more low key this year.
It is awkward for Beijing to celebrate the victory in the Sino-Japanese war, as the KMT led efforts in the war against Japan, not the Chinese Communist Party.
But China's celebrations are also a jab at Japan. With tensions between the two countries on the rise, China can use the event to remind the international community of Japan's World War II atrocities and consolidate its image as a victor in the war. Beijing achieves the double goal of obstructing Japan's bid for a permanent UN Security Council seat and consolidating its superpower status on diplomatic, military and economic fronts.
China also aims to create the impression that Taiwan is a part of China.
In fact, the sovereignty of Taiwan and that of China are completely unrelated. The 1951 San Francisco Treaty states that Japan renounces all right, title and claims to Formosa and the Pescadores. But nowhere does it specify that sovereignty was returned to the Republic of China (ROC), let alone the People's Republic of China.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (
Sovereignty is vested in Taiwan's inhabitants. It has therefore long existed as a sovereign nation. All that remains is for this to be recognized by a change of the national title and constitutional amendments.
When Chen Yi (
The early days of KMT rule in Taiwan were characterized by the 228 Incident and then the White Terror, with 38 years of martial law. The initial wave of sentiment in Taiwan about returning to the embrace of the ancestral country was destroyed by these events. But the idea of Taiwan's retrocession was inculcated into the collective memory of the Taiwanese people by its masters. It was only after the KMT lost power in 2000 that the people of Taiwan were able to adequately reflect on the true situation.
On Oct. 25, 1945, Taiwan saw the end of 50 years of Japanese colonial government and World War II hostilities, but it was immediately plunged into yet another period of rule by foreign overlords. Now, Oct. 25 is seen as the end of the war, and a cause for neither joy nor sorrow. One thing is certain: The fate of this nation now rests solely in the hands of its citizens.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS