Hot air and empty words permeated the recently concluded Fifth Plenary Session of the 16th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
This suggests that the growing conflict within the Chinese leadership would reduce the central government's ability to come to grips with increasingly powerful local governments and military factions. To drill deeper into such an issue, we have to take heed of a number of signs.
Following the Cultural Revolution, the CCP's Central Committee meetings were held once every five years. There has always been significant personnel shifts at each of the fifth plenary sessions -- the incumbent president would arrange for his henchmen to take up important posts during his five-year tenure. Prior to the recently concluded fifth plenum, it was rumored that Chen Liangyu (
In addition, many believed that outgoing Liaoning Province party chief Li Keqiang (
Second, the main objective of the Fifth Plenary Session is to map out China's 11th Five Year Plan. However, the communique only deals with the nation's GDP goals, and does not outline any specific measures to achieve these goals.
Although the latest Five Year Plan covers a wide range of issues, such as macroeconomic controls, China's energy crisis, corruption, the disparity between rich and poor, disadvantaged groups, the development of backward regions, scientific development and counterfeit products, the measures employed to tackle these issues all appear incomplete, banal or pointless.
Third, since Hu and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Fourth, in recent years, China has been making significant concessions to neighboring countries -- ? except Japan -- over territorial disputes. However, the thornier issue facing Beijing is how to resolve border disputes among different autonomous regions and provinces.
During the Fifth Plenary Session, a Hong Kong media outlet disclosed a document that China's State Department addressed to the Ministry of Civil Affairs and the Ministry of Public Security on how to strengthen the efforts to maintain demarcation between provinces and regions. In this document, Beijing asked local governments to maintain stability on borders and eradicate potential conflict. The Hong Kong media's report also pointed out that to contend for resources, people in different regions would also fight against each other, sometimes resorting to armed conflict. On occasion, it required the intervention of Jiang himself to resolve these disputes.
Fifth, not long ago, 17 provincial and city governments called on the central government to forbid foreign media from criticizing their actions (the media within China has rarely been allowed to criticize the government), so that they can do as they wish without even foreign oversight.
One month before the fifth plenum was convened, when Premier Wen was in Guangdong Province conducting a study, an incident in Taishi Village, Panyu County, occurred in which residents tried to depose the village chief. The situation deteriorated, and there was evidence of links between the local government and criminal gangs. Beatings, kidnapping, detention, threats and lies were used to suppress the villagers, British and French reporters were beaten up and a people's representative from Hubei was knocked unconscious. There was a domestic outcry and protests from international groups. Even the US government took an interest. In the face of China's deteriorating reputation abroad, the premier and the central government were impotent, an indication that their authority had been seriously undermined.
Major General Zhu Chenghu (朱成虎), head of the Institute for Strategic Studies at Beijing's National Defense University, and a nephew of People's Liberation Army hero Zhu De (朱德), is now facing off against Air Force Lieutenant General Liu Yazhou (劉亞洲), a deputy political commissar and the son-in-law of former Chinese president Li Xiannian (李先念), representing hawkish and dovish factions respectively. What has happened to military discipline? And what can the central government do? Does the government direct the military or does the military direct the government?
The day after the fifth plenum ended on Oct. 11, the Shenzhou VI rocket was launched. On the same day, Hu Jintao returned to Nanking, his power base. But more especially, he was there to monitor military bases.
As the center has weakened, regional and military factions have become more powerful, creating a greater number of variables affecting China's future. It recalls China's division at the end of the Qing Dynasty, when the Western powers invaded and the regions sought to protect themselves. When the spark of revolution was ignited in Wuchang in 1911, the provinces declared independence one after the other, spelling the end of the Qing empire. Could this also be happening to China's communist empire?
The weakening of centralized power will benefit Hong Kong's autonomy, and is also an opportunity for Taiwan, which already has its own sovereignty. But Taiwan must respond correctly to China's "united front" tactics, and be especially wary of its efforts to intensify foreign struggles, to increase internal cohesion and maintain its grip on power. A conflict with Taiwan would be devastating for the coastal economies, so is it not likely that the provinces would protect their interests and refuse to enter the fray?
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG AND IAN BARTHOLOMEW
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS