The H5N1 avian influenza virus first began spreading through Asia in late 2003. In light of four of its major epidemiological characteristics -- high pathogenicity, rapid spread and inter-species transmission, as well as human fatalities -- the world's infectious disease specialists and public health professionals began to focus attention on it, and predicted that it is unlikely to disappear in just one or two years.
In the face of the new challenges, vaccine production and the implementation of a pandemic influenza-preparedness plan are two important tasks.
The situation with the H5N1 bird flu virus this year brings to light a few obvious points:
First, the virus has expanded its geographic range continuously.
Second, the number of human cases and deaths have continued to rise, especially in places where the virus has not been initially recognized. These places are the most likely sites where an accelerated spread might occur.
Third, the fatality rate among reported and hospitalized bird flu patients has remained above 50 percent.
Fourth, the number of species infected by the H5N1 virus has also risen.
Most importantly, both waterfowl -- seen as the traditional reservoir of the virus -- and pigs have both become infected by a new strain of H5N1 avian influenza.
In addition, the virus' mutations are making it more complex. And if migrating waterfowl carry highly pathogenic strains of the avian influenza virus, this could easily lead to its rapid spread and an international pandemic. Under such conditions, the risk that a simple mistake could spark an even more rapid transmission among humans requires more attention.
After an outbreak in Indonesia last month spread quickly to Burma, India and Bangladesh, European health ministers became anxious. They watched as a new strain of the H5N1 avian flu virus spread north and west, from the Qinghai region in China across Mongolia and Siberia.
Sure enough, Romania reported its first outbreak on Oct. 8, followed by Turkey the next day. Asia's H5N1 virus had spread to continental Europe, bringing with it the danger of an avian flu pandemic.
Over the last few days, US President George W. Bush has made numerous public statements that his government is working hard to make sure the country is prepared for a possible bird-flu pandemic.
In Taiwan, during the outbreak of SARS in 2003, our medical and public health system took quite a battering. Therefore, after the threat had dissipated, infectious disease experts teamed up with the Center for Disease Control in July 2003 to come up with a plan to combat influenza.
The plan included stockpiling antiviral drugs, making free vaccines available to veterinarians and livestock farmers, and boosting research into vaccine development. The government also held an avian flu drill yesterday to ensure that emergency response measures are in place should there be an outbreak.
As there is a strong possibility that the virus could enter Taiwan through migrating waterfowl, illegally imported animals or infected individuals, it is important to educate the public about the issue.
First, it is important not to touch any dead wild birds and to inform local animal-health disease control authorities as soon as possible if any are discovered.
Second, if anyone you know is experiencing severe respiratory symptoms, you should advise them to immediately put on a face mask and seek medical assistance.
Lastly, people considered to be in high risk groups should be vaccinated prior to the flu season.
It is also important that government agencies cooperate and abandon the divisions of the past.
First, the Immigration Office should improve its computerized management operations system, including keeping tabs on people traveling to and from areas where avian flu has been reported.
Second, the government should tell airlines and people working in the hospitality industry how to identify bird flu, and what to do if they come into contact with it.
Third, they should increase the rewards for uncovering smuggling, and ensure that the public knows that illegally imported livestock are likely to pose a public health threat.
Fortunately, at this point transmission of the avian flu virus to humans has been limited.
If we remain on our guard, we will be able to evade a catastrophe.
King Chwan-chuen is a professor at the Institute of Epidemiology in the College of Public Health at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Paul Cooper
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS