Since President Chen Shui-bian (
What has gone wrong? One problem has been the government's desperate attempt to try to please all of the people all of the time.
A second problem is the administration's inclination to "govern by media." More often than not, it appears as if newspaper opinion pages are what create the government's priorities and guide its agenda-setting and policy-making decisions. Government officials hammer out decisions according to columnists' opinions, while lawmakers pose questions on the legislative floor based on what they read in the tabloids.
Hiding behind the protection of their legislative immunity, many pro-China lawmakers cite yet-to-be-confirmed media reports, fanning erroneous accusations against government officials. The pro-China media then picks up on the lawmakers' pontificating, repeating the allegations and driving the vicious cycle of smearing the government through yet another round.
It is understandable that bureaucrats and government agencies prepare media clippings in order to brief their superiors on what opinion pages have said about their performance and to stay in touch with the latest trends and opinions.
However, given the make-up of the nation's media -- the majority of which for historical reasons leans toward a certain party and shares a common interest with the pan-blue camp -- the administration's eager-ness to be well thought of simply leaves it battered and bruised.
The pro-China media is good at two-handed maneuvers that distort the facts while faking public-opinion pieces in an attempt to influence the government's policies. They have been far too successful.
It's sad that the government has often given into such pressure. This, coupled with its inability to efficiently convey its own messages, create the impression of continuous policy flip-flops.
The recent furor over China Steel Corp chairman Lin Wen-yuan's (
Of course the media outlets that have made such allegations and inferences will proclaim that they are simply exercising freedom of the press and holding the administration accountable in order to safeguard the people's interests. But to whom are they holding the government accountable? Whose interests are they guarding? The people in Taiwan or those in China?
The pan-green camp, however, shares a portion of the blame for allowing the pan-blue media to manipulate stories without being challenged. The lack of unity within the DPP has exacerbated this problem. Political struggles among DPP factions have led some people to "leak" a story or information to the pro-China media in order to attack another faction.
The DPP needs to snap out of its lethargy and get its act together. It needs to take the initiative and map out strategies to deter its "death from a thousand [paper] cuts." Better late than never.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS