On Oct. 8, in Shantou, China, Lai Fu-chu (賴福助), a visiting fisherman from Ilan, was beaten to death in broad daylight while Chinese policemen looked on.
The murderers were 20 or so local thugs, and the truck driver with whose truck Lai's car had collided. The slaying scene, as far as one can gather from the news report, mirrors eerily a chilling rampage, occasionally aired on the PBS channel, in which 20 or so chimpanzees gang up on a helpless chimp and beat him to death.
Putting the two incidents side by side, one can't but be alarmed by the savage nature displayed.
Anthropologists tell us that humans differ from chimps because humans have developed ethics and have knowledge of their consequences. This does not bear up with what happened to Lai. It was purely savage and utterly lawless.
This tragic event has several implications. First, China is still a lawless nation. Second, the brazen behavior psychologically correlates with the general attitude upheld by the Chinese leadership. Readers probably still remember vividly, not so long ago, the TV footage of the contemptuous look shown by the former foreign minister Li Zhaoxing (李肇星), as he insolently debased the legitimacy of the Taiwanese leadership.
This impudence has been bolstered by the pan-blues' servile visits to China recently.
These sycophants have verbally reiterated one after another to the Chinese leadership -- ? and worst of all to the Chinese public -- that the Taiwanese government is a faux leadership, as Li Ao (李敖) has done also lately at Fudan University.
Now, if a supposedly erudite man, albeit overtly narcissistic, and a legislator to boot, is willing to thumb his nose at the Taiwanese people, who have elected the current leadership, and declare its mandate devoid of legitimacy, what can't the Chinese do to Taiwanese visitors or business-people. Yes, servility induces impudence, and impudence warrants violence.
Third, the prided code of ethics as developed by the Chinese is a sham in its current milieu. The Taiwanese who still take a great fancy to Chinese culture may do well to bear in mind that the Confucian code of ethics has no bearing whatsoever on its current political or legal or cultural habitat.
If people like Li Ao still want to chant about the glory of Chinese culture, perceptive folks should know that he chants from his memory of things past.
When Li Ao said that "there is no need to smash Taiwan to pieces" since the Taiwanese independence movement is only a "pretend act," who was he kidding? He was basically asking a hungry tiger not to eat the rabbit, since the rabbit was only pretending to run away.
This cajoling, ironically, had not been well received by the thugs in Shantou who claimed the life of a Taiwanese visitor by smashing him to pieces.
Yang Chunhui
United States
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS