Amid plans for a sweeping realignment of US military services in Asia and the Pacific, the army has begun extensive changes intended to turn it into the most flexible and expeditionary force it has been since the end of the war in Vietnam 30 years ago.
From Hawaii, where the headquarters of the army in the Pacific is situated, to the Pacific Northwest of the US mainland, to Alaska, to South Korea and to Japan, the army is being transformed, in the current buzzword of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
Says Lieutenant General John Brown, commanding general of the army in the Pacific: "Almost every one of our brigades and divisions, and all of our major headquarters, will be undergoing transformation over the next two years to better enable us to fight the war on terrorism or engage in any other military operation."
This week, the army activated a new air defense command at Fort Shafter, headquarters of the army in the Pacific. The 94th Air and Missile Defense Command can be deployed anywhere in the region to fight alongside the Pacific Air Force against aerial attack.
Next year, the first elements of a new Stryker Brigade are scheduled to arrive at Schofield Barracks, the army's main post in Hawaii. The key equipment for the brigade's 3900 soldiers will be 300 of the 20 ton armored vehicles that can be transported by air. Another Stryker brigade has been posted in Alaska and three more will be formed at Fort Lewis in the state of Washington.
Supporting the brigade combat teams for the first time will be a reconnaissance battalion equipped with long range sensors, including unmanned aerial drones and analysts to provide quick assessments to brigade commanders. Before, such capabilities were available only at higher levels and it took time for intelligence to trickle down to combat commanders.
At Pearl Harbor is based an army experimental ship, the twin-hulled catamaran "Spearhead" that can move Strykers, troops, and weapons at 40 knots for 4,000km. The army plans to acquire 12 vessels, starting in 2010, with high-tech planning and communications gear that can prepare a force in transit to fight when it lands instead of needing time to get marching orders on the ground.
A brigade of paratroopers that was recently activated in Alaska has already shown an ability to overcome what US military people call the "tyranny of distance" in the vast reaches of the Pacific. The brigade loaded 600 paratroopers into six C17 aircraft where they strapped on chutes in-flight and flew 17 hours with aerial refueling to jump into northern Australia at 1am.
To set up a forward operational headquarters, the army plans to move the I Corps headquarters from Fort Lewis to Camp Zama, a US post southwest of Tokyo. Military officers said negotiations with Japan are progressing and an agreement may be reached in time for President George W. Bush and Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi to announce it next month when Bush visits Japan.
At the next level up, the army headquarters in Hawaii, known officially as US army, Pacific or USARPAC, has been primarily responsible for providing trained and equipped troops to other commands in Asia and as far away as Iraq and Afghanistan.
"Over the next 18 to 24 months," Brown said, "things will change; we'll keep all our existing missions but we will also become a war-fighting headquarters."
That will require the command to devise war plans, prepare for contingencies, and organize a staff to control forces across the full spectrum of military operations.
In addition, the headquarters of the army in the Pacific is preparing to assume command of army forces in South Korea, which are gradually being reduced and may eventually be largely withdrawn. Plans call for dismantling or shrinking the UN Command in Seoul that dates back to the Korean War that ended in 1953.
The army also plans to transfer the Eighth Army headquarters from Seoul to Hawaii and to turn back to the South Koreans control of their forces commanded today by a joint US-South Korea headquarters. The four-star American general's post in Seoul would move to Hawaii.
Military officers say this could happen by 2008 or any time after.
The official line is that the threat from North Korea must lessen and stability come to the Korean Peninsula first. The unofficial betting is that rising anti-Americanism in Seoul will cause that move to be made sooner than later.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and