It's enough to make you bang your head against a wall.
When President Chen Shui-bian (
Chen might find that there is political capital to be had out of appearing to be a sensitive new-age politician who wants everyone to talk, be friendly and reconcile only to have these overtures rejected time and again. But it is increasingly obvious that Ma, who has embraced his undistinguished predecessor's penchant for treating Chen like a door-to-door salesman, thinks he might be onto something when he looks down his nose at the diminutive president.
When he attempted to start a dialogue with former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
Chen's supporters might do well to ask themselves if he hasn't run out of ideas on how to deal with a re-energized opposition that just won't play ball. In the face of this rigidity, the almost daily, autistic rhetoric of "reconciliation" involving the "23 million people of Taiwan" damages the cause it attempts to champion.
In an ideal world, of course, Ma would adopt the same goodwill toward the executive that he has curiously adopted toward the nation's gay and lesbian community -- all the more laudable because of its defiance of the grisly conservatism of his KMT mentors on such matters, and the fact that the DPP has been tardy in stamping out institutional bigotry. But this is not an ideal world. Ma is playing a clever game, letting the DPP talk itself into corners and watching quietly in the wings when not making low-key commentary.
Chen must recognize that appealing for reconciliation with the pan-blue camp -- as distinct from reconciliation between ordinary people of different ethnic backgrounds -- is pointless because the rump of the KMT and PFP machines feel that there is nothing to reconcile over, let alone apologize for.
Though it may frustrate those who seek to employ ethno-nationalism to protect Taiwan from Chinese aggression, ethnic conflict has run out of currency as a political mobilizer, except among a few anachronistic brigands of "Greater China" nationalists and a small number of unelectable fringe independence advocates.
The greatest victim of the exaggeration of the role of ethnic conflict in this country is a president who is sincere in wanting to heal the wounds of the past. But by using anodyne slogans of reconciliation to court professional obstructionists, and thus belaboring an electorate that has already come to terms with the KMT's oppressive past, Chen fails to exploit the fact that ethnic conflict is now almost entirely restricted to the Grand Guignol of party politics.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS