The first sentence of the first text in the first volume of the Selected Works of Mao Zedong (毛澤東) reads: "Who are our enemies? Who are our friends? This is a question of the first importance for the revolution." This is also the essence of Mao Zedong thought, and over the 80-year history of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), it has focused at different times on different domestic and international "class enemies" in an attempt to include them in its revolution.
China's recent diplomatic and military activities imply that Japan is its current enemy. This is easily seen from the military exercise initiated by the People's Liberation Army (PLA) in the Inner Mongolia autonomous region on Sept. 27. Although China invited military observers from 24 different countries, as well as their military attaches stationed in Beijing, it excluded its close neighbors Japan, South Korea and Mongolia.
The invitations to the included countries were said to be a show of military openness and significant to improving mutual understanding and trust, and to deepening friendship and cooperation. Turning that around, even if the exercise were not directly targeted at the three uninvited countries, Beijing at least seems to hold a grudge against them and does not trust them.
The reason South Korea was not invited was in part because the two countries became enemies when China helped North Korea against the Americans during the Korean War, but also because China didn't want to upset North Korea, which had been invited.
For the time being, Beijing does not treat South Korea as an enemy because it wants to "use barbarians to control barbarians" by setting up an anti-Japanese frontline together with South Korea.
But if the two Koreas were to come to blows, Beijing would show no hesitation in treating the South as the enemy.
Mongolia was left out because the exercise took place in Inner Mongolia. This implied an attempt to prevent the independence of Inner Mongolia, which Mongolia would support, and so it was not appropriate to divulge military secrets to them.
The exclusion of Japan is a highly sensitive issue. The current tension in the Sino-Japanese relationship means that Japan feels that China is becoming a threat, in particular a military threat. If China saw Japan as a friendly nation, or at least wanted to improve relations, it would have invited Japan to show that it feels that there is a need for mutual trust and to eliminate Japanese talk of a Chinese threat.
The fact that Beijing did not want to do this is a clear expression of animosity toward Japan, and possibly even a deliberate provocation.
While there has not been any obvious point of friction between China and South Korea or Mongolia lately, there have been lots of problems in the relationship between China and Japan.
First, in April a series of government-supported anti-Japanese demonstrations took place in China. This is not normal in China, where demonstrations and public gatherings are ordinarily prohibited. Although the authorities later suppressed them, it did so not to distance itself from the anti-Japanese character of the demonstrations, but rather because it was afraid they would get out of control.
Second, the night before Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi (吳儀) was to meet with Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi in Japan in late May, Wu canceled the meeting and returned home without informing the Japanese. This was provocative behavior.
Third, South Korea and Japan were the countries nearest to the joint Sino-Russian military exercise in August -- apart from North Korea, which is an ally of China -- and therefore felt a military threat.
On the eve of a vote in Japan's Lower House last month, five Chinese navy ships patrolled a disputed area with supposed oil and gas fields in the East China Sea. China then declared that it had set up a preventative group of navy ships to strengthen its overall naval military capabilities. Once again, this was clearly targeted at Japan.
These incidents show that China clearly sees Japan as its main enemy, together with the US, but it cannot afford to upset the Americans. Beijing must also be aware that this increases regional tensions.
But its actions are clearly threatening to Japan, and will only serve to strengthen security cooperation between Washington and Tokyo, as well as Japan's inclination to be concerned about Taiwan's defense.
If these actions, which are not in line with Beijing's "peaceful rising," are a sign that the CCP's top military leaders have been overwhelmed by militarist thinking, do they suggest that Chinese President Hu Jintao (
I wonder if Beijing has thought through what may happen in its western regions while it is concentrating on the East.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Perry Svensson
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS