The Legislature Yuan achieved a new low on Tuesday, difficult as it may be to believe that it can continue to find new depths to sink to. The usual tussles and shoving matches included two female lawmakers in a hair-pulling and slapping contest. Both women ended up in the legislature's medical center afterward and one was later taken to a hospital for further examination.
While the public appears to have grown inured to chaotic nursery-school scenes on the legislative floor, one cannot help but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a president of a country who has to deal with this delinquent behavior on a weekly basis.
If any inspiration were to be drawn from Tuesday's chaotic replays of the previous week's spats, it would be that the country is in desperate need of a new constitution since the current one no longer provides the framework for a functioning democracy.
When Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi ran into strong opposition to his efforts to privatize Japan Post, he decided to dissolve parliament and call new elections. The result was a victory for his Liberal Democratic Party, which now holds a parliamentary majority.
Taiwan's political system is different from that of Japan. The premier does not possesses the authority to initiate a no-confidence vote. Taiwan's system is a semi-presidential one, similar to that of France. So President Chen Shui-bian (
Lawmakers' absurd behavior is all right if the legislature wishes to keep its infamous reputation. But it is disturbing and intolerable that lawmakers seem determined to drag Taiwan's development and national reputation down as well.
There are 12 legislative committees. Dominated by the pan-blues, the committees' sole motivation appears to be an obsession with chipping away at the administration's authority and blocking any of its reform efforts. The worst one in this regard is the Procedure Committee, which on Tuesday rejected the arms-procurement budget for the 30th time, refusing to put it on the legislature's agenda. It also blocked Chen's lists of nominees for the Control Yuan once again.
No matter how much the pan-blue lawmakers try to deny their bias, it is clear that any draft bill or budget proposal that the pan-blue camp is opposed to will never make it out of the Procedure Committee. There is no chance that any of the other committees might have the chance to review the proposals, much less that they get put to a vote on the legislative floor.
There are a number of politicians, both inside and outside the legislature, who are apparently blind to the mass migration of Taiwanese industries to China, to China's military threat, the rising unemployment rate and the plight of people living in flood-prone areas. They cannot see the people because they have their sights locked on the 2008 presidential election.
The complete malfunction on display daily in the legislature has pushed Taiwan's democracy to the edge of a cliff. The lawmakers may enjoy their fistfights, name-calling and food fights, but most people are heartily sick of it all. The emperor Nero has gone down in history as fiddling while Rome burned. Taiwan's legislators will be remembered for their histrionics and sham fights as the nation's economy and future fell to pieces around them.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS