Premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) challenged the opposition camp to initiate a "no-confidence vote" on his Cabinet, so President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) can dissolve the Sixth Legislative Yuan and call a new election. It would be worthy of a listing in the Guinness Book of World Records if the Cabinet in a democratic country were overthrown by a no-confidence vote pushed by the ruling party itself.
Why have Taiwan's democratic politics declined to this point? In countries with years of experience in party politics, opposition parties are relatively rational. They do not "oppose for the sake of opposing," disregarding the safety and welfare of their nation and its people.
Take for example the disaster caused after Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans last month. The White House and the US Congress are competing with each other to provide aid, instead of passing the buck.
What is more interesting is that lawmakers from both parties are now pointing fingers at US President George W. Bush. Why? The answer is very simple: They are responding to public opinion.
In democratic countries in the East, the principle of upholding overall national interests is barely respected due to the traditional feudal culture here. Take for example Japan, which has adopted a Cabinet system. In the past, its political stability relied on the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). But Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi recently resolutely dissolved parliament, disregarding the opposition of some legislators in his party who opposed the privatization of Japan's postal system. It was a major gamble in the eyes of political observers.
Still, the Japanese people passed this test of their political capacity and wisdom, and made a choice to support Koizumi and his party based on his resolve to implement the reforms.
Looking at the development of party politics in Taiwan since 2000, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has won the presidency twice. The opposition parties, led by their party chairmen, have been unable to accept defeat, and have employed a "scorched earth policy" in the legislature, leaving numerous policies suspended in mid-air.
Meanwhile, the DPP has happily taken this as an excuse for its failure to implement policies. With the dogfight continuing to this day, how can we realize a democratic country's most fundamental principle: party politics with political accountability?
After thinking about this thoroughly, I believe that the problem is a result of bad choices made by voters in the presidential and legislative elections since 2000. Since the people's understanding of democracy has not yet matured to a certain level, whenever the presidency and the legislative majority are held by different political camps, it is impossible for the opposition to participate in politics rationally, making today's chaos seem inevitable.
The voters did not put the legislature in the hands of the opposition camp out of a collective awareness of political balance. They did so because of a tendency to choose individual candidates rather than parties in legislative elections. Candidates' grassroots connections and the practice of vote-buying also have an effect.
In the next legislative elections -- whether they come about because opposition parties initiate a no-confidence vote on Hsieh's Cabinet, or as scheduled in 2007 -- voters should consider supporting candidates who belong to the same party as the president.
Only by doing so can the ideal of party politics and political accountability be realized. If this occurs, the ruling party will not have any excuse to shirk responsibility, and voters can certainly punish it in the next election if it performs poorly.
Andrew Cheng is a researcher in the Institute of Biomedical Sciences at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS