Just like the previous 12 attempts, the General Committee of the UN's General Assembly has blocked Taiwan's thirteenth attempt to gain UN membership. For Taiwan, this result is but another temporary setback in the ongoing process toward achieving its ultimate goal. Taiwan will not stop trying to gain entry into the UN until it opens its doors.
Unlike the previous bids, the government this year also put forward a proposal aiming to maintain peace across the Taiwan Strait. The proposal cautions all UN member states that China has 700-plus ballistic missiles targeted at Taiwan, and alerts it to the fact that all nations in the region are concerned about this.
It also urges the UN to demonstrate its deep concern over China's tendency to use military force, by showing solidarity with Taiwan's universal wish for peace. Although the Swedish President of the General Assembly, Jan Eliasson, concluded following the debate that Taiwan's proposals would not be included in the General Assembly's agenda due to a lack of consensus on both issues, that approach has caused the international community to take heed of the cross-strait situation and Taiwan's status. Although Taiwan yet has to succeed in its bid, this has indeed meant some progress in the matter.
China is a permanent member of the UN's Security Council, with veto powers and great influence, so it isn't very surprising that both of Taiwan's proposals were blocked. It should be noted that China's representative saw the visits to China by Taiwan's opposition leaders as helpful in furthering China's international propaganda, saying that those visits showed the international community that there is no cross-strait tension and that UN membership for Taiwan is a non-issue.
China thus used diverging opinions among Taiwan's political parties as a tool for attacking Taiwan's pursuit of UN membership. The fact that China can use Taiwan's opposition parties in its propaganda is a national tragedy.
In the past, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (
Now, however, they are acting as the vanguard for China-friendly agents and going against the interests of the whole population of Taiwan to further their own political interest, as a result of their resentment over President Chen Shui-bian's (
When China's President Hu Jintao (
The fact that Taiwan's politicians have failed to reach a basic consensus on major national goals and unite in their dealings with the international community gives China's united front approach chance after chance to attack Taiwan.
The fact is, the biggest problem with Taiwan's UN bid is Taiwan, not China. Past opinion polls showed more than 80 percent of Taiwanese support the government's UN bid, yet politicians' shortsighted actions neglect public opinion to promote their individual and their parties' interests, and this has become the biggest obstacle in making a bid for UN membership.
The government should therefore hold a referendum on the bid, together with the year-end elections. Apart from showing the people's determination, it would also restrain politicians in words and deeds. Whoever opposes the bid would then be considered a public enemy.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means