Just like the previous 12 attempts, the General Committee of the UN's General Assembly has blocked Taiwan's thirteenth attempt to gain UN membership. For Taiwan, this result is but another temporary setback in the ongoing process toward achieving its ultimate goal. Taiwan will not stop trying to gain entry into the UN until it opens its doors.
Unlike the previous bids, the government this year also put forward a proposal aiming to maintain peace across the Taiwan Strait. The proposal cautions all UN member states that China has 700-plus ballistic missiles targeted at Taiwan, and alerts it to the fact that all nations in the region are concerned about this.
It also urges the UN to demonstrate its deep concern over China's tendency to use military force, by showing solidarity with Taiwan's universal wish for peace. Although the Swedish President of the General Assembly, Jan Eliasson, concluded following the debate that Taiwan's proposals would not be included in the General Assembly's agenda due to a lack of consensus on both issues, that approach has caused the international community to take heed of the cross-strait situation and Taiwan's status. Although Taiwan yet has to succeed in its bid, this has indeed meant some progress in the matter.
China is a permanent member of the UN's Security Council, with veto powers and great influence, so it isn't very surprising that both of Taiwan's proposals were blocked. It should be noted that China's representative saw the visits to China by Taiwan's opposition leaders as helpful in furthering China's international propaganda, saying that those visits showed the international community that there is no cross-strait tension and that UN membership for Taiwan is a non-issue.
China thus used diverging opinions among Taiwan's political parties as a tool for attacking Taiwan's pursuit of UN membership. The fact that China can use Taiwan's opposition parties in its propaganda is a national tragedy.
In the past, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (
Now, however, they are acting as the vanguard for China-friendly agents and going against the interests of the whole population of Taiwan to further their own political interest, as a result of their resentment over President Chen Shui-bian's (
When China's President Hu Jintao (
The fact that Taiwan's politicians have failed to reach a basic consensus on major national goals and unite in their dealings with the international community gives China's united front approach chance after chance to attack Taiwan.
The fact is, the biggest problem with Taiwan's UN bid is Taiwan, not China. Past opinion polls showed more than 80 percent of Taiwanese support the government's UN bid, yet politicians' shortsighted actions neglect public opinion to promote their individual and their parties' interests, and this has become the biggest obstacle in making a bid for UN membership.
The government should therefore hold a referendum on the bid, together with the year-end elections. Apart from showing the people's determination, it would also restrain politicians in words and deeds. Whoever opposes the bid would then be considered a public enemy.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS