Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) has finally announced that it is to postpone the commencement of its service by one year. This comes as no big surprise, but it does serve to show that the project is far from complete. I, for one, would prefer it if the company ensured that everything was in place before they start operating the service. After all, it is not the postponement that concerns us, it is the question of whether the system will live up to the claims the company has made regarding safety, speed and smooth operation.
The contract between the Ministry of Transportation and Communications and THSRC states that the company is allowed to operate the railway for 35 years, including the construction stage. Therefore this one-year extension will cut into THSRC's profits, shortening the period in which they can recoup their initial outlay by 12 months; it does not actually infringe upon their contractual obligations.
The high-speed rail project, which uses the build, operate and transfer (BOT) model, has already generated much debate over its costs. Nevertheless, the whole country will indisputably profit from the convenience and economic benefits that the railway will bring. Therefore, we should approach this delay rationally.
According to a survey conducted by the ministry, the biggest concerns regarding the high-speed rail are accessibility and safety. The stations in Taipei are to be accessible from the MRT system, as they will be in Taichung and Tsoying (左營) -- the terminal stop in Kaohsiung. Other stations, however, will be outside the city centers.
Naturally, ease of access will influence whether people decide to use the service, and the convenience of transferring from one mode of transport to the high-speed railway is a crucial factor. This will not only require the creation of a road network, it will also need transport companies to offer routes serving the railway's stations.
In addition, the coordination of flights and the high-speed railway should be considered. At the moment most people rely on Chiang Kai-Shek International Airport (CKS) in Taoyuan when they go abroad. If passengers from the south wish to travel to CKS on the high-speed railway, they will need to lug their luggage to the nearest station, many kilometers away from the city center, take the train to Chingpu (
One way we can prepare for the opening of the high-speed rail, then, is to adopt a passenger-oriented service mentality and develop a coordinated system.
The delay also gives the THSRC extra time to conduct tests on, and monitor, problems that arise from the operation of machinery and coordination systems, and to test and modify operational and safety procedures. Protocols for emergency response, maintenance of passenger cars and tracks, and compensation for late services are key to the sustained development of the high-speed rail.
The THSRC has to make sure everything is in place if it is to avoid a plethora of system failures and the resulting fallout -- as happened in the initial stages of France's high-speed rail. Any incidents resulting from system errors or safety lapses can only cause THSRC problems.
Finally, the company needs to avoid relying entirely on technology transfers from abroad and should use this period to consult local experts from industry, government and academia. In this way, the company will be able to stand on its own two feet and even export its knowledge of high-speed railway operations in the future.
Cheng Yung-hsiang is an assistant professor in the department of logistics management at National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS