Could a lie told a thousand times become a truth?
Yes, it could. That is what China believes in, and attempts to concoct regarding Taiwan's sovereignty. China has been entertaining vengeance against Japan and the West, for both have abused China in the past. Unable to take revenge on either country, China instead turned its anger on Taiwan, a small chip that China once abandoned and now claims as part of its territory. However, the claim stands on thin ice and must be refuted with facts.
Geometry says that a platform requires a minimum of three pillars to stand firmly on the globe. How many pillars support China's claim of title to Taiwan? Zero.
In 1895, by signing the Treaty of Shimonoseki with Japan as a result of defeat in a Sino-Japanese war, China ceded Taiwan to Japan in perpetuity, in addition to paying huge amounts of monetary compensation.
In 1943, the Cairo Declaration, a joint statement slightly better than a press release with no legal power, was issued expressing the common intent of restoring Taiwan to China after the war as a condition enticing China to pin down Japanese forces on the Asian continent.
In 1945, World War II ended with Japan's defeat and surrender to the Allied powers. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government was assigned by the Allied powers as their agent to administer Taiwan.
In 1949, defeated by the Chinese Communists, the KMT took refuge in Taiwan. The KMT was supposed to be an agent of the Allied powers, but they began a reign of terror. Meanwhile, the communists declared the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) government in Beijing.
In 1950, the Korean War broke out. US president Harry Truman dispatched the Seventh Fleet to the Taiwan Strait.
In 1951, by signing the San Francisco Peace Treaty (SFPT), Japan renounced its title to Taiwan. That treaty, however, did not nullify the Treaty of Shimonoseki. In essence, Taiwan's legal status did not revert to what it was prior to the signing of the Treaty of Shimonoseki.
Furthermore, neither the Republic of China (ROC) government nor the PRC government represented the state of China in drafting or concluding the treaty. The treaty, which entered into effect in 1952, completely overrode the Cairo Declaration and excluded China from issues pertaining to Taiwan.
In 1952, after the SFPT took effect, the ROC government taking refuge in Taiwan signed a Treaty of Peace with Japan reaffirming the terms of SFPT. However, the ROC government was at that time not representing Taiwan in any legal capacity.
In 1971, the PRC government replaced the ROC government as the sole representative of China in the UN.
In 1972, following US president Richard Nixon's visit to China, the US government and the PRC government issued the Shanghai Communique. It contains, however, statements of disagreement in which both the US and China staked out incongruent positions. The US government only acknowledged that China claimed title to Taiwan.
In 1978, the PRC government signed a Treaty of Peace and Friendship with Japan. No provision of the treaty deals with title to Taiwan. In the same year, the US derecognized the ROC government and established formal diplomatic ties with the PRC government.
In 1979, the US Congress passed the Taiwan Relations Act, a domestic law for handling all affairs with Taiwan.
Given the condensed history and all known legal documents associated with those events, it is without doubt that Taiwan's sovereignty is as yet unsettled. No single state was ever conferred title to Formosa Taiwan since 1952.
No wonder China was unable to support its claim of reacquiring title to Taiwan in the Shanghai Communique of 1972, except by sneaking in a legally unsupportable statement that "Taiwan is a province of China which has long been returned to the motherland" to indulge itself.
Chinese people in the past hundred years have immersed themselves into a state of constantly seeking ways to shake off its humiliations at the hands of the West and Japan. The strong desire is understandable and respected. What is deplorable is the tactics they employ.
Imperial Russia sold Alaska to the US, a voluntary transaction which the succeeding Russian governments may regret but cannot revoke. By the same token, imperial China ceded Taiwan, considered an unruly island, to Japan in 1895 -- a deed that China can't revert.
It was a bitter pill that the state of China had to swallow to keep the rest of its territory intact. Neither ignoring its past misdeed nor attempting to whitewash well-documented international treaties will restore China's pride or glory. Whipping up nationalistic riots against Japanese interests or passing an Anti-Secession Law against the Taiwanese people will only ill serve China.
Taiwan was once a territory of China. So was Cuba once a territory of Spain, and New Mexico a part of Mexico. Claiming title to Taiwan by twisting historic facts, China may fool some people some times, but can never fool all the people all the time.
No, a lie told a thousand times never becomes a truth.
Kengchi Goah
Cranbury, New Jersey
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS