The Taiwanese don't think of their nation as an island nation at all, Vice President Annette Lu (
Lu's brainchild, the Democratic Pacific Union (DPU), aspires to build a common culture -- she calls it a "blue civilization" -- among the 26 democratic countries adjacent to the Pacific Ocean. Seagoing culture, commerce, and security are central to the DPU's mission. She can start at home by reinvigorating Taiwan's own maritime culture.
Taiwan often seems to be a land-based society, but it sits about 160km off the Chinese landmass, at the midpoint of the "first island chain." Its Aboriginal tribes excelled at nautical pursuits such as fishing. Well-known seafarers such as the explorer Zheng He (
Traders operated from its coasts, flouting the Confucian injunction against profit-making. Pirates set up shop on the island, harrying shipping that, then as now, took the convenient route through the Taiwan Strait to Chinese seaports. Dissident Chinese intellectuals made the island a haven, a buffer against imperial oppression.
Over the centuries, however, emigration from the mainland eclipsed Taiwan's nautical culture. The Ming dynasty outlawed seagoing commerce in the 1500s, dismantling China's formidable navy. In the 1600s and 1700s, after the ban was lifted, settlers poured across the Strait in search of economic prosperity, bringing with them a culture that regarded China as the "Middle Kingdom," the epicenter of civilization.
To call China a land-based culture understates matters. Settlers from China superimposed their own culture, which placed enormous weight on ties to the ancestral homeland, on Taiwan's indigenous seafaring culture. The sea had little place in the worldview of the island's dominant group.
In the late 1940s, after battling vainly against Mao Zedong's (毛澤東) Red Army, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) led his army across the Strait, re-establishing his nationalist government in Taipei. This new influx of Mainlanders imprinted their own China-centric view on Taiwan's culture. Followers of Chiang thought of Taiwan as little more than a base from which to "recapture the mainland."
Official dogma backed by martial law perpetuated the land-based view. Although Taipei has quietly abandoned its claim to rule all of China, the traditional attitude persists among older Taiwanese, especially those born in China, who tend to regard Taiwan not as an island nation in its own right but as a temporary outpost. Rejuvenating oceanic thinking will not be easy.
In part because of the land-oriented view, Taiwan's leadership has let the nation's maritime defenses slip at a time when China's naval power is surging, and the US military, the island's long-time protector, is tied down elsewhere.
Lu and like-minded maritime enthusiasts need to help others appreciate the dangers and opportunities emanating from the sea. Reaching out to young Taiwanese who harbor no illusions about "taking back the mainland" would be a good start. Celebrating the island's maritime heritage would also help. Interest in Taiwan's Aboriginal seafaring culture is on the rise, while the 600th anniversary of Zheng He's voyages is fast approaching. And the DPU's efforts to nurture a common Pacific culture could pay off in the long-term. Taiwan must look seaward.
James Holmes is a senior research associate at the University of Georgia's Center for International Trade and Security and a former US naval officer.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means