The Legislative Yuan will reconvene next Tuesday, amid hopes that a prolonged political standoff between the governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the pan-blue opposition can finally end.
Although a new opportunity to break the ice has appeared, continued distrust still obstructs rational and healthy interaction between the government and the pan-blue legislators.
The year-end local elections will further darken the opportunity for constructive interaction between the Chen Shui-bian (
Chen and his DPP colleagues have shown goodwill to the pan-blue camp by adjusting the controversial budget for the purchase of three major defensive weapon systems from the US in the hope of receiving a friendly response from the opposition.
Chen's appeal was supported by Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平). Wang suggested that the bill should at the very least be freed from the boycott imposed by the pan-blue majority in the legislature's Procedure Committee and properly referred to the National Defense Committee for review and open discussion.
Regretfully, legislators from the People First Party (PFP) remain steadfast in blocking the budget. Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
In addition to that long-delayed bill, numerous urgently needed budgets and draft laws related to the people's livelihood are also awaiting review and passage. These include the special NT$80 billion (US$2.46 billion) flood prevention budget, governmental streamlining in the draft revisions to the Organic Law of the Executive Yuan (
The public favors an end to legislative obstructionism and villainy and an opening of rational dialogue between the governing and opposition parties.
Untying the political knot depends primarily on the KMT's new leadership, especially Ma. The extent to which Ma can avoid interference from his predecessor Lien Chan (
Ma should take the initiative by making a fresh start and abandoning the KMT's past destructive strategy of boycotting everything proposed by Chen. He should also try to persuade the PFP to stop putting its narrow partisan interests above the public good.
Ma should persuade his allies in the PFP to heed the public's will. Instead of being held hostage by the PFP over nominations for local elections, Ma should should put into practice his theory of bringing moderation and pragmatism into Taiwanese politics.
The government should also refrain from engaging in a war with the pan-blue opposition. Premier Frank Hsieh's (
A group composed of experts, academics and opinion leaders must be formed to monitor legislators' performance. Only through such public monitoring can Taiwanese politics be put back on the right track.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS