The Pescadores, or Penghu in Mandarin, are a group of 64 small islands with an area of 80km2 situated in the Taiwan Strait, about 40km off the west coast of Taiwan.
On Aug. 1, Premier Frank Hsieh (
While it is not clear whether this new policy has the blessing of President Chen Shui-bian (
The experience of the small three links at Kinmen and Matsu has been miserable. The original expectation of developing the economy of these islands simply did not pan out. Chinese tourists have been few. Taiwanese businesspeople merely use Kinmen and Matsu as convenient transit points; they do not stop there long enough to spend money. As for investment, it has been a one-way flow, as well-to-do residents of the islands poured money into the thriving real estate market on the Chinese side.
To be sure, for businesspeople who travel between Taiwan and China the small three links mean savings in travel expenses and time. This advantage pales, however, compared to the intractable problems the links have caused. Smuggling is now routine and often ignored by Taiwan's coast guard.
Where it involves cheaper daily necessities from China, little harm is done. The small three links, however, also facilitate the smuggling of illicit drugs, guns and ammunition into Taiwan, empowering criminal elements.
Another problem is the transmission of diseases from China through circumvention of health and sanitary inspections. The Financial Times has warned of a potential pandemic caused by the spread of the lethal H5N1 strain of avian flu ("How to nip the flu epidemic in the bud," Aug. 5). Taiwan's Department of Health has said there was a serious risk of avian flu breaking out in Taiwan between January and March of next year. The US Center for Disease Control has even predicted as many as 14,000 Taiwanese deaths should there be an outbreak.
Against this background, it is disconcerting to learn that on Aug. 21, the Coast Guard Administration (CGA) intercepted a Taiwanese fishing boat carrying more than 4,500 smuggled birds from China.
The question is how many smuggling boats are escaping capture by the CGA.
Even more dangerous is the smuggling of Chinese spies and PLA special forces operatives, who land on Kinmen and Matsu with falsified papers and then infiltrate Taiwan with ease.
Taiwan's military bases are notorious for their lackadaisical security measures. Taiwan's infrastructure, such as water reservoirs and the power grid, are vulnerable to sabotage. Taiwan's political and military leaders could become targets of PLA assassination squads. It is no exaggeration to say that the Trojan horse is already inside Taiwan's gate, thanks in part to the small three links.
It is incomprehensible why the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government would want to open up Penghu for another small three links, when the experience of Kinmen and Matsu has been such an utter failure.
Furthermore, there are other reasons why this will be an egregious mistake in policy. First, the Pescadores are an indispensable military bastion guarding the security of Taiwan. In 1622, the Dutch took possession of Penghu for its strategic location and then took Taiwan in 1624 in exchange for relinquishing Penghu. In June 1683, Qing Dynasty admiral Shih Lang (
Opening up Penghu to infiltration by Chinese agents and spies will do irreparable harm to the security of both Penghu and Taiwan proper.
Second, the legal status of the Pescadores is entirely different from that of Kinmen and Matsu. The Pescadores have always been an integral part of Taiwan. In 1895, the Pescadores were ceded to Japan in perpetuity, along with the main island of Taiwan, by the Qing dynasty. In the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan renounced its title to Taiwan and the Pescadores. Kinmen and Matsu, on the other hand, have historically been China's outlying islands.
Even though these islands are now controlled by Taiwan, they are destined to be returned to China in the event of an amicable settlement between Taiwan and China, because Taiwan has no legitimate claim on Kinmen and Matsu, just as China has no valid claim on Taiwan.
In its public statements, the government has often lumped Kinmen, Matsu and Penghu together, seemingly oblivious to the important distinction in legal status between Penghu and the Chinese outlying islands. This is a dangerous practice which could lead allies such as the US and Japan to conclude that Taiwan lacks the resolve to defend Taiwan's sovereignty and may be amenable to eventual annexation by China.
Third, opening Penghu to the small three links could also accelerate the demoralization of the Taiwanese citizenry. Ever since KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
China is intensifying its united front tactics to divide and conquer Taiwan, undermining the authority of the government. Chinese fishing vessels have been encroaching repeatedly on the territorial waters of Kinmen, Matsu and Penghu. Although Chen has ordered a week-long "Clear Sky" campaign to chase the Chinese vessels away, the problem will recur so long as the links are in place. Implementing Penghu's links under these circumstances can further erode Taiwanese people's confidence in the government's ability to defend Taiwan's sovereignty and democracy.
Chen should order Hsieh to cease pursuing this suicidal policy. Penghu's economic problem should be solved by encouraging tourists from Japan and Okinawa, not from China, an adversary intent on devouring Taiwan.
The DPP and its administration have not clearly enunciated a vision for Taiwan's future. Public statements have often been inconsistent and contradictory. However, its deeds in dealing with China, whether by action or inaction, may be characterized as unilateral, incremental concessions to China. This policy has steadily changed the status quo in China's favor. A point of no return will soon be reached, where preserving Taiwan's de facto independence will no longer be a viable option.
Don't link Penghu with China.
Li Thian-hok is a freelance commentator based in Pennsylvania.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS