This year, the UN has entered its 60th year. UN members, including governments and NGOs, as well as many scholars, all agree that the organization needs a major overhaul in response to the new post-Cold War global environment, but there is little agreement as to the nature of this overhaul. In the middle of this month, national leaders will meet at a UN summit to discuss these reforms.
Although Taiwan was forced to withdraw from the UN in 1971, it will be present, and also play an active role in the summit. In fact, since 1993, through the agency of its diplomatic allies, Taiwan has sought to rejoin the UN and gain legitimate representation in the organization. This year is no exception. This year, Taiwan is trying a new strategy, and has asked its diplomatic allies to submit a proposal asking the UN to maintain "stable and peaceful relations across the Taiwan Strait." As one of the UN's missions is to "maintain international peace and security," the request that the UN play an active role in this regard is legitimate, reasonable and justified.
Since 2000, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) has intensified its efforts to expand its arsenal. According to a Pentagon report on China's military power released in July, the country has over 700 missiles targeting Taiwan, and the the number is increasing by 75 to 120 missiles per year. Not only does China have the ability to invade Taiwan now, it also promulgated an "Anti-Secession" Law in March, which authorizes the PLA to employ "non-peaceful means and other necessary measures to protect China's sovereignty and territorial integrity," legitimizing the use of force.
The draft resolution of this year's proposal contains three points. First, it urges both sides of the Taiwan Strait to use peaceful means to resolve disputes. Second, it requests that the UN's secretary-general appoint an envoy or a truth investigation committee to evaluate cross-strait security and report back to the UN General Assembly, the Security Council and other relevant agencies. Third, it requests that the UN secretary-general take necessary measures to encourage and help realize cross-strait dialogue and exchanges.
It echoes the agreement made at US-Japan Security Consultative Committee talks in February to view stability in the Taiwan Strait as a "common strategic objective," as well as to call on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to peacefully resolve disputes though dialogue.
This conforms to the stance of quite a few EU nations. It also challenges the UN's "conspiracy of silence" on the cross-strait issue, which is a violation of its charter. Also, the content of the proposal this year is somewhat unconventional because its intention is to transform the Taiwan Strait issue, claimed by China to be a domestic issue, and make it an international one. By doing so, it highlights the threat China poses to Taiwan.
China was obviously caught off guard by this move, and its delegation to the UN could only wheel out the "one China" principle and UN Resolution No. 2758 (which recognizes the representatives of the PRC as the only legitimate representatives of China), to oppose the proposal.
Taiwan's proposal is certainly innovative in emphasizing the UN's role as an international keeper of the peace, which will be a benchmark for reforms intended to improve the effectiveness of the UN. Taiwan needs this type of innovative thinking in its diplomatic battles. As the nation lobbies for support from member countries with proposals related to the UN charter, it is highlighting the need for the UN to show determination and effectiveness in the new century.
Parris Chang is the deputy secretary-general of the National Security Council.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS