And so Typhoon Talim staggers into China after running into the faithful brick wall that is the Central Mountain Range. It left Taiwan behind with a very low death toll, so low that lives were probably saved because motorists stayed home -- instead of adding to the daily carnage on the nation's roads.
Talim and Typhoon Haitang were the first super typhoons in five years to menace this country, perhaps an indication that Taiwan has had a fairly easy run of things recently, notwithstanding the deaths, destruction and financial losses caused by flooding and landslides in other storms in the interim. But if global-warming theorists are on the right track, such storms will likely increase in size and frequency.
The flooding of New Orleans offers a reminder of how much worse things could be if storms maintain a higher degree of violence as they make landfall. Granted, the geographical differences between the Mississippi Delta and Taiwan's mountainous buffer are so stark that they barely rate a mention, but there remain lessons that disaster-management officials and the general public can heed from the misfortune of communities along the Gulf Coast.
Take, for example, complacency and recklessness. US officials have speculated that many residents ignored mandatory evacuation orders because previous evacuations seemed pointless, resulting in a kind of "cry wolf" effect that put thousands of people in mortal danger. Others were simply ignorant of the power of winds and storm surges that could tear buildings off their foundations and drown them inside their homes.
In Taiwan, there is a long history of typhoon complacency -- from the stupidity of floodgate supervisors to home and store owners who fail to secure loose, sharp objects that could become lethal missiles in a powerful gust. For recklessness, one need only witness that species of motorscooter rider that battles winds amid falling debris every time a typhoon strikes.
Such problems are best addressed by reminding people that there is wisdom in caution, and by tightening discipline on the part of government and the police, which happily is more evident in Taipei City than earlier in Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
The problem with evacuation, however, is that unlike Americans, Taiwanese have few places to run. Yet, in the event of a catastrophic typhoon, there is clearly room for improvement in preventative measures. Parts of the Lanyang Basin (蘭陽), for example, which are home to most of Ilan County's population, are vulnerable to flooding and storm surges. The four-lane Taipei-Ilan Freeway, due to open at the end of the year, could greatly facilitate evacuations to the west coast in the event of a disastrous storm in the area; it is hoped that such a strategy might be part of a more sober analysis of long-term disaster risk -- and the development of contingency measures that do not wait until the day before landfall before coming into effect.
The comforting thing is that, unlike in the US, people in this country rarely prey on each other in the wake of natural disasters. If this level of civility can translate into a more circumspect attitude to the inevitability of severe weather, then there is no reason that death tolls cannot be kept low.
During a natural disaster, there are times for education and for intervention. All that remains is recognizing which is required at a given time, and having the confidence to stand by decision-making processes that occasionally err on the side of caution.
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS