While image-building is an essential element for every politician in building popularity, it must always be accompanied by hard work and the promise of reform to convince voters that he or she is to be trusted.
With a new mandate after becoming chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is perhaps Taiwan's most popular political figure.
His popularity derives largely from the overwhelming endorsement of pan-blue-camp supporters. Most believe that Ma will embrace the huge job of turning the century-old party into a younger, action-driven and "black gold"-free organization because of his reputation as a clean and moderate politician.
The question is, is the so-called "Ma era" an exaggeration of his significance? Or does it represent an effective solution to rejuvenate the KMT and forge a new Taiwanese politics based on rational and institutional competition?
Ma has had a rough start. He built a degree of internal support and boosted the KMT's flagging morale on the one hand, but has so far failed to inject a sense of purpose into or a concrete vision for the party.
Despite pledging to bring fresh air to the KMT's Central Standing Committee election, what resulted was a power struggle between Ma's team and the old guard. As the old guard in the Legislative Yuan remains influential on the committee, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) will continue to play a pivotal role in the party's decision-making process.
Ma made a second mistake by agreeing to sign a contract to sell the building housing the party-affiliated Institute on Policy Research and Development for NT$4.3 billion (US$133 million), despite zoning restrictions and claims that this property was stolen during KMT rule.
The KMT's long-time monopoly of and transactions in illegal property and assets are a political tumor. The Democratic Progressive Party has criticized the sale as a scheme exposing "Mayor Ma's" attempt to profit as "KMT Chairman Ma," and has demanded that the KMT return the assets to the state.
Ma's decision to sell the property is inconsistent with his pledge to resolve the party-assets issue by 2008 because no sincerity or sign of reform is apparent from the move.
Although Ma has made no progress in terms of party reform, he continues to try to build popularity by showing up on entertainment programs while spurning President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) invitations to discuss domestic and cross-strait affairs.
The fact is that aside from his historic-high popularity rating, what will count will be the extent to which Ma can maintain this momentum. Without aggressive and effective action that deals with the KMT's myriad problems, Ma's soaring approval rating will not last long.
What separates a great leader from a good leader is the ability to communicate with voters in a timely and determined fashion. A great leader should not allow himself to be held back by the old guard, and should not put partisan interests above the national interest or sacrifice fundamental values for short-term popularity.
Ma's greatest challenge is to walk out of his predecessor's shadow and embrace what this society really needs. Ma will only be able to demonstrate his fitness as a presidential candidate by manifesting a new leadership style that can allow the KMT to emerge from the shadow of its authoritarian past and its churlish reaction to loss of power and instead play a positive role in bridging political and social divisions that can allow the nation to move forward.
Image-is-everything politics is no longer effective in a changing Taiwan.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS