In the late 19th century, French scientist James Arsene D'Arsonval proposed using the difference between cold deep-seawater and surface-level seawater to generate electricity, something known as Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC).
During the 1970s energy crisis, the US, Japan and France initiated a decade-long OTEC research project that produced many results, in particular concerning power generators, which almost advanced to a commercially viable level. It is estimated that a flow of 3m3 of deep-seawater and the same volume of surface water will generate 10 megawatts of electricity, without using fuel or producing any carbon dioxide.
At the time, the US government was preparing to help companies build a pilot plant on a commercial scale. This plan was unexpectedly laid to rest when the Reagan administration moved into the White House. Looking at the decision now, it was probably a result of US energy policies which focused on controlling cheap Middle East oil. Now, however, that has become the source of the current global unrest.
There are reportedly two ways to develop thermal energy. The first is to build a power plant on the shore or on the continental shelf. Such thermal power plants are very suitable for the east coast of Taiwan. There are few suitable locations along the shoreline, but many on the continental shelf. It has been estimated that 5 gigawatts could potentially be produced.
Technically, the only remaining problem is cold-water pipelines on the seafloor. Fixed surface platforms, submarine power cables and underwater tanks are all existing technology.
The second way to develop thermal energy is to use movable, floating power plants, which are suitable for locations in the large, common sea areas along the lower latitudes where typhoons are rare. This was also the main point that the US was pushing for in the 1970s.
Planned and feasible solutions include obtaining hydrogen through water electrolysis and then producing ammonia by adding nitrogen to the hydrogen, or producing methyl alcohol by adding carbon to the hydrogen. Both ammonia and methyl alcohol are clean fuels that could be used as replacement for gasoline. If all suitable sea areas around the world could be used without destroying the environment, it would be possible to produce more energy than the total current global need, which shows the potential of this approach.
The technologies required by ocean thermal energy conversion already exist, and they only have to be adopted for ocean use. The ocean environment, however, is special, and research power plants are small in scale, so the cost of current facilities remains far higher than for other types of power plants.
OTEC power plants, however, do not require fuel, nor do they produce pollution. In a long term perspective, fuel prices are bound to go up and environmental pressures will also increase. If the technology involved is improved, commercial OTEC power plants will become the trend of the future; but only by commercialization will OTEC succeed.
Preliminarily, the government could provide appropriate funds which businesses could apply for by submitting plans to develop and introduce individual essential technologies, while pilot plants only would be built when the time is ripe. Businesses would be guaranteed their operational rights. Because auxiliary funds would be required, businesses should make cautious estimates and do everything they can to overcome any problems.
As a maritime nation, Taiwan should emphasize the development of marine resources and jump at this great opportunity.
Liang Nai-kuang is a professor in the Institute of Oceanography at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) hastily pushed amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) through the Legislative Yuan, sparking widespread public concern. The legislative process was marked by opaque decisionmaking and expedited proceedings, raising alarms about its potential impact on the economy, national defense, and international standing. Those amendments prioritize short-term political gains at the expense of long-term national security and development. The amendments mandate that the central government transfer about NT$375.3 billion (US$11.47 billion) annually to local governments. While ostensibly aimed at enhancing local development, the lack
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Having enjoyed contributing regular essays to the Liberty Times and Taipei Times now for several years, I feel it is time to pull back. As some of my readers know, I have enjoyed a decades-long relationship with Taiwan. My most recent visit was just a few months ago, when I was invited to deliver a keynote speech at a major conference in Taipei. Unfortunately, my trip intersected with Double Ten celebrations, so I missed the opportunity to call on friends in government, as well as colleagues in the new AIT building, that replaced the old Xin-yi Road complex. I have
On New Year’s Day, it is customary to reflect on what the coming year might bring and how the past has brought about the current juncture. Just as Taiwan is preparing itself for what US president-elect Donald Trump’s second term would mean for its economy, national security and the cross-strait “status quo” this year, the passing of former US president Jimmy Carter on Monday at the age of 100 brought back painful memories of his 1978 decision to stop recognizing the Republic of China as the seat of China in favor of the People’s Republic of China. It is an
RSS