In the late 19th century, French scientist James Arsene D'Arsonval proposed using the difference between cold deep-seawater and surface-level seawater to generate electricity, something known as Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC).
During the 1970s energy crisis, the US, Japan and France initiated a decade-long OTEC research project that produced many results, in particular concerning power generators, which almost advanced to a commercially viable level. It is estimated that a flow of 3m3 of deep-seawater and the same volume of surface water will generate 10 megawatts of electricity, without using fuel or producing any carbon dioxide.
At the time, the US government was preparing to help companies build a pilot plant on a commercial scale. This plan was unexpectedly laid to rest when the Reagan administration moved into the White House. Looking at the decision now, it was probably a result of US energy policies which focused on controlling cheap Middle East oil. Now, however, that has become the source of the current global unrest.
There are reportedly two ways to develop thermal energy. The first is to build a power plant on the shore or on the continental shelf. Such thermal power plants are very suitable for the east coast of Taiwan. There are few suitable locations along the shoreline, but many on the continental shelf. It has been estimated that 5 gigawatts could potentially be produced.
Technically, the only remaining problem is cold-water pipelines on the seafloor. Fixed surface platforms, submarine power cables and underwater tanks are all existing technology.
The second way to develop thermal energy is to use movable, floating power plants, which are suitable for locations in the large, common sea areas along the lower latitudes where typhoons are rare. This was also the main point that the US was pushing for in the 1970s.
Planned and feasible solutions include obtaining hydrogen through water electrolysis and then producing ammonia by adding nitrogen to the hydrogen, or producing methyl alcohol by adding carbon to the hydrogen. Both ammonia and methyl alcohol are clean fuels that could be used as replacement for gasoline. If all suitable sea areas around the world could be used without destroying the environment, it would be possible to produce more energy than the total current global need, which shows the potential of this approach.
The technologies required by ocean thermal energy conversion already exist, and they only have to be adopted for ocean use. The ocean environment, however, is special, and research power plants are small in scale, so the cost of current facilities remains far higher than for other types of power plants.
OTEC power plants, however, do not require fuel, nor do they produce pollution. In a long term perspective, fuel prices are bound to go up and environmental pressures will also increase. If the technology involved is improved, commercial OTEC power plants will become the trend of the future; but only by commercialization will OTEC succeed.
Preliminarily, the government could provide appropriate funds which businesses could apply for by submitting plans to develop and introduce individual essential technologies, while pilot plants only would be built when the time is ripe. Businesses would be guaranteed their operational rights. Because auxiliary funds would be required, businesses should make cautious estimates and do everything they can to overcome any problems.
As a maritime nation, Taiwan should emphasize the development of marine resources and jump at this great opportunity.
Liang Nai-kuang is a professor in the Institute of Oceanography at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS