In the late 19th century, French scientist James Arsene D'Arsonval proposed using the difference between cold deep-seawater and surface-level seawater to generate electricity, something known as Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC).
During the 1970s energy crisis, the US, Japan and France initiated a decade-long OTEC research project that produced many results, in particular concerning power generators, which almost advanced to a commercially viable level. It is estimated that a flow of 3m3 of deep-seawater and the same volume of surface water will generate 10 megawatts of electricity, without using fuel or producing any carbon dioxide.
At the time, the US government was preparing to help companies build a pilot plant on a commercial scale. This plan was unexpectedly laid to rest when the Reagan administration moved into the White House. Looking at the decision now, it was probably a result of US energy policies which focused on controlling cheap Middle East oil. Now, however, that has become the source of the current global unrest.
There are reportedly two ways to develop thermal energy. The first is to build a power plant on the shore or on the continental shelf. Such thermal power plants are very suitable for the east coast of Taiwan. There are few suitable locations along the shoreline, but many on the continental shelf. It has been estimated that 5 gigawatts could potentially be produced.
Technically, the only remaining problem is cold-water pipelines on the seafloor. Fixed surface platforms, submarine power cables and underwater tanks are all existing technology.
The second way to develop thermal energy is to use movable, floating power plants, which are suitable for locations in the large, common sea areas along the lower latitudes where typhoons are rare. This was also the main point that the US was pushing for in the 1970s.
Planned and feasible solutions include obtaining hydrogen through water electrolysis and then producing ammonia by adding nitrogen to the hydrogen, or producing methyl alcohol by adding carbon to the hydrogen. Both ammonia and methyl alcohol are clean fuels that could be used as replacement for gasoline. If all suitable sea areas around the world could be used without destroying the environment, it would be possible to produce more energy than the total current global need, which shows the potential of this approach.
The technologies required by ocean thermal energy conversion already exist, and they only have to be adopted for ocean use. The ocean environment, however, is special, and research power plants are small in scale, so the cost of current facilities remains far higher than for other types of power plants.
OTEC power plants, however, do not require fuel, nor do they produce pollution. In a long term perspective, fuel prices are bound to go up and environmental pressures will also increase. If the technology involved is improved, commercial OTEC power plants will become the trend of the future; but only by commercialization will OTEC succeed.
Preliminarily, the government could provide appropriate funds which businesses could apply for by submitting plans to develop and introduce individual essential technologies, while pilot plants only would be built when the time is ripe. Businesses would be guaranteed their operational rights. Because auxiliary funds would be required, businesses should make cautious estimates and do everything they can to overcome any problems.
As a maritime nation, Taiwan should emphasize the development of marine resources and jump at this great opportunity.
Liang Nai-kuang is a professor in the Institute of Oceanography at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS