Hardly had Admiral Gary Roughead taken the helm as the new commander of the US Pacific Fleet than the Chinese and Russian armed forces gave him something to think about.
Those two forces in the Western Pacific have just completed eight days of joint maneuvers centered on the Shandong Peninsula, across the Yellow Sea from the Korean Peninsula. The drills were conducted with 10,000 military people on land, at sea and in the air, about 8,500 of them Chinese.
That's not large as these things go, but it was the first such exercise done together since the breakup of the Soviet Union 15 years ago. It marked another step in a gradual Sino-Russian reconciliation after decades of rivalry during the days of the Soviet Union.
The war games evidently had three purposes: serve notice on the US that it has military competitors in the Western Pacific; show the Taiwanese once again that China would use force if that nation formally declared independence; and market more weapons to a China that has already bought Russian warships and aircraft.
Roughead suggested that he was more interested in the Chinese than the Russian navy, much of which has been stranded by a lack of funds.
"Clearly, the Chinese are developing a very capable modern military, especially the navy," he said in an interview at his Pearl Harbor headquarters. "The question is: What do they see as the intended use of that navy?"
"If it is to ensure the free flow of commerce, that would not be surprising," he said, nodding toward the sea lanes in the South China and East China Seas through which pass the oil and raw materials that feed China's billowing economy, not to mention its soaring exports.
The admiral added, however: "What if the intent is not purely to defend the sea lanes?"
Roughead said he had been keenly interested in learning what ships and aircraft the Chinese and Russians had deployed during the war games, how they operated together and how they integrated their commands and communications.
His Pacific Fleet was not invited to send observers to the maneuvers nor would he or any other officer discuss ways in which intelligence was being gathered. It does not take a rocket scientist, however, to figure out that a couple of US submarines, several reconnaissance aircraft and surveillance satellites have been watching and listening closely.
Roughead, who took command of the Pacific Fleet's 200 warships, 1,400 aircraft and 190,000 sailors and marines on July 8, said he would not drastically change course from that set by his predecessor, Admiral Walter Doran.
"When you come on watch," Roughead said, "normally you don't trim the sails right away."
Much of his attention will be directed to continuing the transformation of the US' armed forces ordered by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. In the Pacific and Asia, that is adding to navy responsibilities as the US plans to depend on seapower and airpower rather than ground forces in most contingencies.
In the dispute over Taiwan, for instance, the US would rely on ships and airplanes to help defend Taiwan if China sought to enforce its claim to sovereignty with an assault and if President George W. Bush decided it would be in the US' interest to resist.
Roughead said he planned to invite more Asian and Pacific navies to take part in multilateral exercises, in contrast to bilateral drills. To increase their ability to operate together, he would like to persuade allied navies to codify their procedures.
That would be true not only with blue-water navies, such as those of Japan, Australia and India, but also with the smaller navies of Southeast Asia fighting pirates that prey on merchant ships in their waters. The admiral stressed, however, that he would seek informal arrangements, not another NATO.
The need for codified procedures is also needed within the US Navy, Roughead said. Not many years ago, the US really had two navies, in the Atlantic and the Pacific. With a smaller navy today, ships may be deployed from one fleet to another and must be able to fit in with a new assignment seamlessly.
With an eye toward China's expanding submarine force, Roughead emphasized anti-submarine warfare. It relies on submarines, said to be the best weapon against other submarines, surface ships equipped with sonar, torpedoes and new anti-submarine missiles, and low-flying aircraft.
"This is an area," the admiral said, "that we want to be able to dominate."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS