Hardly had Admiral Gary Roughead taken the helm as the new commander of the US Pacific Fleet than the Chinese and Russian armed forces gave him something to think about.
Those two forces in the Western Pacific have just completed eight days of joint maneuvers centered on the Shandong Peninsula, across the Yellow Sea from the Korean Peninsula. The drills were conducted with 10,000 military people on land, at sea and in the air, about 8,500 of them Chinese.
That's not large as these things go, but it was the first such exercise done together since the breakup of the Soviet Union 15 years ago. It marked another step in a gradual Sino-Russian reconciliation after decades of rivalry during the days of the Soviet Union.
The war games evidently had three purposes: serve notice on the US that it has military competitors in the Western Pacific; show the Taiwanese once again that China would use force if that nation formally declared independence; and market more weapons to a China that has already bought Russian warships and aircraft.
Roughead suggested that he was more interested in the Chinese than the Russian navy, much of which has been stranded by a lack of funds.
"Clearly, the Chinese are developing a very capable modern military, especially the navy," he said in an interview at his Pearl Harbor headquarters. "The question is: What do they see as the intended use of that navy?"
"If it is to ensure the free flow of commerce, that would not be surprising," he said, nodding toward the sea lanes in the South China and East China Seas through which pass the oil and raw materials that feed China's billowing economy, not to mention its soaring exports.
The admiral added, however: "What if the intent is not purely to defend the sea lanes?"
Roughead said he had been keenly interested in learning what ships and aircraft the Chinese and Russians had deployed during the war games, how they operated together and how they integrated their commands and communications.
His Pacific Fleet was not invited to send observers to the maneuvers nor would he or any other officer discuss ways in which intelligence was being gathered. It does not take a rocket scientist, however, to figure out that a couple of US submarines, several reconnaissance aircraft and surveillance satellites have been watching and listening closely.
Roughead, who took command of the Pacific Fleet's 200 warships, 1,400 aircraft and 190,000 sailors and marines on July 8, said he would not drastically change course from that set by his predecessor, Admiral Walter Doran.
"When you come on watch," Roughead said, "normally you don't trim the sails right away."
Much of his attention will be directed to continuing the transformation of the US' armed forces ordered by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. In the Pacific and Asia, that is adding to navy responsibilities as the US plans to depend on seapower and airpower rather than ground forces in most contingencies.
In the dispute over Taiwan, for instance, the US would rely on ships and airplanes to help defend Taiwan if China sought to enforce its claim to sovereignty with an assault and if President George W. Bush decided it would be in the US' interest to resist.
Roughead said he planned to invite more Asian and Pacific navies to take part in multilateral exercises, in contrast to bilateral drills. To increase their ability to operate together, he would like to persuade allied navies to codify their procedures.
That would be true not only with blue-water navies, such as those of Japan, Australia and India, but also with the smaller navies of Southeast Asia fighting pirates that prey on merchant ships in their waters. The admiral stressed, however, that he would seek informal arrangements, not another NATO.
The need for codified procedures is also needed within the US Navy, Roughead said. Not many years ago, the US really had two navies, in the Atlantic and the Pacific. With a smaller navy today, ships may be deployed from one fleet to another and must be able to fit in with a new assignment seamlessly.
With an eye toward China's expanding submarine force, Roughead emphasized anti-submarine warfare. It relies on submarines, said to be the best weapon against other submarines, surface ships equipped with sonar, torpedoes and new anti-submarine missiles, and low-flying aircraft.
"This is an area," the admiral said, "that we want to be able to dominate."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS