Hardly had Admiral Gary Roughead taken the helm as the new commander of the US Pacific Fleet than the Chinese and Russian armed forces gave him something to think about.
Those two forces in the Western Pacific have just completed eight days of joint maneuvers centered on the Shandong Peninsula, across the Yellow Sea from the Korean Peninsula. The drills were conducted with 10,000 military people on land, at sea and in the air, about 8,500 of them Chinese.
That's not large as these things go, but it was the first such exercise done together since the breakup of the Soviet Union 15 years ago. It marked another step in a gradual Sino-Russian reconciliation after decades of rivalry during the days of the Soviet Union.
The war games evidently had three purposes: serve notice on the US that it has military competitors in the Western Pacific; show the Taiwanese once again that China would use force if that nation formally declared independence; and market more weapons to a China that has already bought Russian warships and aircraft.
Roughead suggested that he was more interested in the Chinese than the Russian navy, much of which has been stranded by a lack of funds.
"Clearly, the Chinese are developing a very capable modern military, especially the navy," he said in an interview at his Pearl Harbor headquarters. "The question is: What do they see as the intended use of that navy?"
"If it is to ensure the free flow of commerce, that would not be surprising," he said, nodding toward the sea lanes in the South China and East China Seas through which pass the oil and raw materials that feed China's billowing economy, not to mention its soaring exports.
The admiral added, however: "What if the intent is not purely to defend the sea lanes?"
Roughead said he had been keenly interested in learning what ships and aircraft the Chinese and Russians had deployed during the war games, how they operated together and how they integrated their commands and communications.
His Pacific Fleet was not invited to send observers to the maneuvers nor would he or any other officer discuss ways in which intelligence was being gathered. It does not take a rocket scientist, however, to figure out that a couple of US submarines, several reconnaissance aircraft and surveillance satellites have been watching and listening closely.
Roughead, who took command of the Pacific Fleet's 200 warships, 1,400 aircraft and 190,000 sailors and marines on July 8, said he would not drastically change course from that set by his predecessor, Admiral Walter Doran.
"When you come on watch," Roughead said, "normally you don't trim the sails right away."
Much of his attention will be directed to continuing the transformation of the US' armed forces ordered by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. In the Pacific and Asia, that is adding to navy responsibilities as the US plans to depend on seapower and airpower rather than ground forces in most contingencies.
In the dispute over Taiwan, for instance, the US would rely on ships and airplanes to help defend Taiwan if China sought to enforce its claim to sovereignty with an assault and if President George W. Bush decided it would be in the US' interest to resist.
Roughead said he planned to invite more Asian and Pacific navies to take part in multilateral exercises, in contrast to bilateral drills. To increase their ability to operate together, he would like to persuade allied navies to codify their procedures.
That would be true not only with blue-water navies, such as those of Japan, Australia and India, but also with the smaller navies of Southeast Asia fighting pirates that prey on merchant ships in their waters. The admiral stressed, however, that he would seek informal arrangements, not another NATO.
The need for codified procedures is also needed within the US Navy, Roughead said. Not many years ago, the US really had two navies, in the Atlantic and the Pacific. With a smaller navy today, ships may be deployed from one fleet to another and must be able to fit in with a new assignment seamlessly.
With an eye toward China's expanding submarine force, Roughead emphasized anti-submarine warfare. It relies on submarines, said to be the best weapon against other submarines, surface ships equipped with sonar, torpedoes and new anti-submarine missiles, and low-flying aircraft.
"This is an area," the admiral said, "that we want to be able to dominate."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS