Richard Chang (
We believe that apart from such business scum, there are also decent businesspeople and conglomerates who abide by the law and cherish their reputation. Taiwan's government and media should uncover the vicious deeds of such opportunists to stop them from succeeding and make them the laughingstock of businesspeople around the world.
However, the biggest problem for Taiwan's high-tech companies is that tycoons such as Chang and Robert Tsao (曹興誠), founder of United Microelectronics Corp (UMC, 聯電), do not even have the courage to admit their wrong-doing. Instead, they have tried to argue, and publish newspaper ads accusing the government of political persecution in order to shirk their moral and legal responsibilities. Being such bad examples, one wonders how they can possibly ask their employees to obey company rules and discipline.
The government has always given preferential treatment to high-tech companies in the Hsinchu industrial park to nurture their development. Rents are lower than for the average citizen, cost for water and electricity are far lower than for companies outside the park, and annual taxes amount to next to nothing. Because the government over many years has adopted several measures to promote "star" industries, employees in these industries today get substantial year-end bonuses. Some companies even have enough money to take funds from their profits to set up educational funds giving them an outsanding image in the eyes of society at large. Now that the government is asking them to cooperate, it should only be natural for them to assist. People like Chang are shameless to the point where they reject our country.
The US, Japan and South Korea have already tightened legislation to stop high-tech companies from moving abroad -- to China in particular -- in order to prevent China from growing militarily stronger. But in Taiwan, the country most urgently needing to block high-tech and military components from entering China, government and civil society seem to care only about money, and ignore national security and survival as if it were some other country's problem. They seem to think that China never will understand how to use the products manufactured by Taiwanese high-tech companies in China for military purposes. It would surely be ironic if it could be proven that the missiles China now has aimed at Taiwan contain chips or other components manufactured by Taiwanese companies.
We might also ask why companies such as Nokia still invest in Northern Europe, rather than just shifting all of their operations to China, when Taiwanese businesspeople claim that moving to China is crucial for the next phase of high-tech industries. Also, why has Taiwan's Uni-President Enterprises Corp, after several decades there, decided to recall hundreds of Taiwanese employees from China? It is about the human factor -- investing in China is not the only way to make a profit.
Today, many companies sell out Taiwan for their own benefit as the result of the government's past industrial policies being too lax. The government should control capital, talent and technology to punish businesses investing in China illegally. This is the only way to make Taiwan's corporate tycoons consider basing themselves in Taiwan and finding more reasonable and effective ways to reform their businesses to increase competitiveness instead of being taken in by the myth about cheap Chinese labor.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS