Richard Chang (
We believe that apart from such business scum, there are also decent businesspeople and conglomerates who abide by the law and cherish their reputation. Taiwan's government and media should uncover the vicious deeds of such opportunists to stop them from succeeding and make them the laughingstock of businesspeople around the world.
However, the biggest problem for Taiwan's high-tech companies is that tycoons such as Chang and Robert Tsao (曹興誠), founder of United Microelectronics Corp (UMC, 聯電), do not even have the courage to admit their wrong-doing. Instead, they have tried to argue, and publish newspaper ads accusing the government of political persecution in order to shirk their moral and legal responsibilities. Being such bad examples, one wonders how they can possibly ask their employees to obey company rules and discipline.
The government has always given preferential treatment to high-tech companies in the Hsinchu industrial park to nurture their development. Rents are lower than for the average citizen, cost for water and electricity are far lower than for companies outside the park, and annual taxes amount to next to nothing. Because the government over many years has adopted several measures to promote "star" industries, employees in these industries today get substantial year-end bonuses. Some companies even have enough money to take funds from their profits to set up educational funds giving them an outsanding image in the eyes of society at large. Now that the government is asking them to cooperate, it should only be natural for them to assist. People like Chang are shameless to the point where they reject our country.
The US, Japan and South Korea have already tightened legislation to stop high-tech companies from moving abroad -- to China in particular -- in order to prevent China from growing militarily stronger. But in Taiwan, the country most urgently needing to block high-tech and military components from entering China, government and civil society seem to care only about money, and ignore national security and survival as if it were some other country's problem. They seem to think that China never will understand how to use the products manufactured by Taiwanese high-tech companies in China for military purposes. It would surely be ironic if it could be proven that the missiles China now has aimed at Taiwan contain chips or other components manufactured by Taiwanese companies.
We might also ask why companies such as Nokia still invest in Northern Europe, rather than just shifting all of their operations to China, when Taiwanese businesspeople claim that moving to China is crucial for the next phase of high-tech industries. Also, why has Taiwan's Uni-President Enterprises Corp, after several decades there, decided to recall hundreds of Taiwanese employees from China? It is about the human factor -- investing in China is not the only way to make a profit.
Today, many companies sell out Taiwan for their own benefit as the result of the government's past industrial policies being too lax. The government should control capital, talent and technology to punish businesses investing in China illegally. This is the only way to make Taiwan's corporate tycoons consider basing themselves in Taiwan and finding more reasonable and effective ways to reform their businesses to increase competitiveness instead of being taken in by the myth about cheap Chinese labor.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS