A thorough look at current Taiwanese politics often prompts people to call for an end to the political standoff and for rational dialogue between the ruling party and the opposition.
As Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Certainly, one of Ma's key responsibilities is to make a comeback after the party's consecutive losses in the last two presidential elections. The expectations of the majority of the public, however, center more on the hope that he will help bring back normal party competition and halt the opposition's obstructionism.
While President Chen Shui-bian (
Ma lacks a strong determination to present a vision for the country. He will need to use new thinking to find a way to forge constructive interaction with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government and bring about institutional checks and balances in Taiwanese politics.
It is sad to see that he has focused most of his efforts over the past few weeks on trying to appease his defeated competitor in the chairmanship race, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-ping (
In doing so, Ma has failed to live up to KMT voters' expectations that he would inject fresh air into the century-old party, and has disappointed the public by hesitating to outline a clear plan for engaging in a rational and policy-oriented contest with the DPP.
It is natural for Ma to incorporate a prudent and incremental approach to consolidate his power in the new KMT power structure. Nevertheless, more concrete steps and determined action will be needed to remold the party and reorganize the pan-blue camp. One of the main challenges that Ma will encounter is establishing an internal democratic decision-making mechanism.
The key for Ma lies in the extent to which he can distinguish himself from Lien's obstructionism against the Chen administration over several crucial legislative bills that the government has pushed forward intensively in the past months.
In other words, Ma should reorient the KMT's consistent and destructive strategy of "boycotting everything proposed by the president" and persuade the KMT's ally, the People First Party, to play the role of the "loyal opposition."
Moreover, Ma must prevent the pan-blue camp from making all its political calculations based simply on individual party interests -- at the expense of the public's needs.
The public has witnessed the verbal wars between the DPP government and the pan-blue opposition for the past five years. Ma's inauguration is an opportunity to open a new era of reconciliation and dialogue -- but only if he can employ political wisdom and pragmatism.
In any democracy, checks and balances between political parties are normal. A dutiful opposition certainly may criticize the administration and articulate its opinions in order to win the next election, and the public can judge the truth and fairness of its criticisms. A smart leader, however, must grasp the pulse of society and take aggressive action to meet the public's expectations.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS