The eight-day Chinese-Russian military exercise that opened yesterday has been dubbed "Peace Mission 2005."
The joint military exercise focuses mainly on an amphibious landing in the Bohai Gulf along the coast of northeastern China.
Both sides will be using elite assault troops in the exercise, and also their most advanced fighter-bombers.
The People's Liberation Army's (PLA) overall strategic concept in this exercise is to achieve air superiority prior to launching an amphibious attack. It is not difficult to see what the real target of such an exercise is.
Since 2002, China has held eight joint military exercises with foreign troops, but the current exercise with Russia is the first high-level joint exercise of such complexity that is using equipment of such sophistication.
Although Russia's overall military power still lags behind that of the US, it is still more powerful than that of China.
This is a valuable opportunity for the PLA to improve the efficiency of combined operations with Russia, and also to consolidate relations between the two nations.
This is an indirect indication of an improvement in Chinese-Russian relations, as both nations share the aim of increasing their influence in the Asia-Pacific region.
The Russian government has attached considerable importance to these exercises.
To ensure that the exercises are carried out to the highest standards, the Russian Army has carried out preparatory exercises in their far eastern territories.
The PLA, of course, can use this opportunity to achieve closer ties with senior Russian military figures and verify the effectiveness of the assault craft it is considering purchasing from Russia.
These assault craft include anti-submarine vessels, amphibious landing craft, guided-missile destroyers, nuclear submarines, Bear strategic bombers with guided missile capability, backfire bombers and long-range bombers.
All of these are expected to participate in the exercise.
The US has shown interest in both the scope and format of the drills, as well as the effectiveness of the weapons that are employed.
Washington is even more interested to learn about their methods of communication, the command and control mechanism, the application of electronic parameters and the exchange of intelligence between the two nations.
The exercises are expected to have a significant impact on the balance of power in Asia and are also an opportunity for China and Russia to make the US take note of their growing military strength.
Although China and Russia do not yet stand as equals, their influence in the region is likely to increase.
In the face of closer Chinese-Russian military cooperation, the US must strengthen its ties with Japan, South Korea and other key nations around Asia if it is to consolidate regional security.
As for Taiwan, if the arms-procurement bill can be passed, it will serve as a further safeguarding of the security of the Taiwan Strait.
It will also indirectly strengthen US-Taiwan relations through military cooperation -- and counter the disruption in regional power that has been created by the Chinese-Russian exercise.
Chang Yan-ting is a colonel in the ROC air force, an associate professor at the Air Force Institute of Technology and a strategy instructor at the Military College of the National Defense University.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS