Thousands of Russian and Chinese troops deploy in a third country at the request of the UN to separate warring sides in a spiraling ethnic conflict.
This scenario for the "Peace Mission 2005" joint maneuvers that open today in Vladivostok and conclude on China's Shandong Peninsula next Thursday certainly passes muster at first glance.
But then details grate, such as the participation of diesel submarines and Russian long-distance and strategic bombers in a simulated repulsion of another country's navy from the conflict zone.
"In this case, the peacekeeping mission is transformed into something resembling a standard operation to take over a third country's territory," notes Russian military analyst Alexander Golts.
"It is not hard to guess which territory authorities have in mind. It is none other than Taiwan," he added.
Moscow and Beijing deny that the exercises involving 8,000-10,000 forces and some 140 ships are a rehearsal for seizing Taiwan.
They are rather geared to raise the ability of the armed forces to "jointly combat international terrorism, extremism and separatism," the Chinese government said in a recent statement.
The war games come amid efforts to establish a Chinese-Russian counterweight to US hegemony in world affairs.
After last month's talks in Moscow between Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Russian President Vladimir Putin, the leaders issued a declaration that some observers deemed was edged with anti-US sentiment, criticizing "moves towards a monopoly" in global political issues and calling for a "multi-polar world order."
Moscow is particularly sensitive to the US military presence and growing influence in the republics of former Soviet Central Asia.
Meanwhile, Washington has reacted coolly to the combined display of military muscle in the Far East, saying that it believes the maneuvers will assist the common goal of ensuring stability in the region.
Another factor in the exercises is Russia's wish to maintain its lucrative arms sales to China, which reached an annual volume of US$1 billion in recent years.
Deployment over the coming days of Tu-22M long-range bombers and Tu-95 strategic bombers that can carry nuclear warheads may be part of a drive to interest the Chinese in purchases of these aircraft.
Russia is also aware that its influence in the Far East is steadily diminishing in the post-Soviet era. The joint exercises may be seen as elementary saber-rattling to boost its profile.
Amid Russia's dwindling clout in the "near abroad," or ex-Soviet republics along its borders, some Russian experts also warn that the growing alliance with China is fraught with risk.
"We've been so desperate to hold together the tatters of our own `near abroad' that we failed to notice that we have now become part of China's `near abroad,'" political analyst Andrei Piontkovsky said.
The chiefs of staff from the two countries will open the exercises today in the Russian port of Vladivostok.
The main activities will get under way from Saturday on the Shandong Peninsula on the Yellow Sea.
Russia's general staff has denied that Beijing initially wanted to stage the exercises off the coast of Taiwan, and said Shandong, which is located 1,300km to the north, was always the intended site.
Next month, Russian and Indian troops will also hold their first joint maneuvers against potential threats by militants on land and sea in Rajasthan in northwestern India and in the Indian Ocean.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s