Following Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan's (
A number of organizations dominated by the KMT held talks with Beijing on Taiwanese agricultural exports that led Chinese authorities to unilaterally grant tariff-free entry for 18 kinds of fruit from Taiwan. Another delegation, made up of KMT members, visited Beijing to discuss direct charter flights with Chinese officials.
On Tuesday, Lien said that KMT chapters across the country could engage in exchanges with the CCP members between the end of this month and next month. The KMT is also planning to invite officials from China's Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) to co-host an "economic development forum" in October to establish a platform for KMT-CCP cooperation.
As outgoing chairman, Lien has seen fit to made significant decisions about KMT-CCP exchanges. Has his successor, Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Each time Lien calls a press conference to make a big announcement about the KMT's new direction, he creates problems for the future chairman. He also invites criticism from the public by repeatedly saying the wrong things. In a press conference on Tuesday, he criticized President Chen Shui-bian (
More important, however, is the question of the nature of the relationship between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China (PRC). If both sides of the Taiwan Strait were part of the same country, it would be natural for the KMT to build a relationship with the CCP. But Taiwan and the PRC are two different countries, neither of which holds any jurisdiction over the other.
Negotiations about the export of agricultural products to China or direct cross-strait charter flights -- which the KMT has busied itself with -- are perogatives of the government, not one political party. The KMT should not make up excuses to send delegations to negotiate with Chinese officials, nor should it use its private agreements with Beijing to trespass on the government's authority.
No one has any doubts that the KMT's effort to promote a cross-strait policy different from that of the government is simply a tool aimed at winning the 2008 presidential election.
The people of Taiwan must give serious thought to whether the policies pursued by Lien as KMT chairman, including the building of closer relations with China, direct links and agricultural exports, are designed to destroy Taiwan, or whether they can bring about peace and prosperity for both sides of the Strait. This is also a question to which the new leadership of the KMT should give serious consideration.
Whether the KMT's China policy is supported by the people will become evident in the year-end mayoral and county commissioner elections. Can Ma afford not to listen to the voice of voters?
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS