Following Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan's (
A number of organizations dominated by the KMT held talks with Beijing on Taiwanese agricultural exports that led Chinese authorities to unilaterally grant tariff-free entry for 18 kinds of fruit from Taiwan. Another delegation, made up of KMT members, visited Beijing to discuss direct charter flights with Chinese officials.
On Tuesday, Lien said that KMT chapters across the country could engage in exchanges with the CCP members between the end of this month and next month. The KMT is also planning to invite officials from China's Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) to co-host an "economic development forum" in October to establish a platform for KMT-CCP cooperation.
As outgoing chairman, Lien has seen fit to made significant decisions about KMT-CCP exchanges. Has his successor, Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Each time Lien calls a press conference to make a big announcement about the KMT's new direction, he creates problems for the future chairman. He also invites criticism from the public by repeatedly saying the wrong things. In a press conference on Tuesday, he criticized President Chen Shui-bian (
More important, however, is the question of the nature of the relationship between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China (PRC). If both sides of the Taiwan Strait were part of the same country, it would be natural for the KMT to build a relationship with the CCP. But Taiwan and the PRC are two different countries, neither of which holds any jurisdiction over the other.
Negotiations about the export of agricultural products to China or direct cross-strait charter flights -- which the KMT has busied itself with -- are perogatives of the government, not one political party. The KMT should not make up excuses to send delegations to negotiate with Chinese officials, nor should it use its private agreements with Beijing to trespass on the government's authority.
No one has any doubts that the KMT's effort to promote a cross-strait policy different from that of the government is simply a tool aimed at winning the 2008 presidential election.
The people of Taiwan must give serious thought to whether the policies pursued by Lien as KMT chairman, including the building of closer relations with China, direct links and agricultural exports, are designed to destroy Taiwan, or whether they can bring about peace and prosperity for both sides of the Strait. This is also a question to which the new leadership of the KMT should give serious consideration.
Whether the KMT's China policy is supported by the people will become evident in the year-end mayoral and county commissioner elections. Can Ma afford not to listen to the voice of voters?
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS