The Foreign Affairs journal recently published an extensive report on the possibility of a flu epidemic breaking out in the near future, prompting Taiwan's media and the public to start paying attention to the issue. In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a similar warning at the beginning of last year, after reports of human infections by the avian-influenza strain H5N1 surfaced in Vietnam and Thailand. More than a year has passed and the number of human bird-flu infections is on the rise, with people in Cambodia and Indonesia being contaminated by the disease as well.
Recent research suggests that the H5N1 virus has become more flexible in adapting to the environment and limited human-to-human transmissions have taken place. If the virus continues to evolve and becomes easily transmitted from person to person, a pandemic then becomes imminent. Since Taiwan occupies a strategic position in Asia, we cannot disregard this risk.
Throughout history, influenza pandemics have caused massive loss of life and brought adverse social and economic consequences. Therefore, we need to seize all opportunities to prepare for a possible pandemic so that its impact will be restricted as far as possible. The Department of Health (DOH) has been engaging in preparations for a probable pandemic since the beginning of last year. Other than stockpiling antiviral drugs, the DOH declared novel influenza a notifiable communicable disease at the end of last year and set up 460 "sentinels for novel influenza sampling" throughout Taiwan. The purpose of the sentinels is for effective surveillance and prompt provision of antiviral treatment to those suspected of having contracted bird flu. So far all patients who met the sampling criteria have been proven clear of avian influenza through laboratory testing.
In addition, the "National Preparedness Plan for Influenza Pandemic" drawn up by the DOH was passed by the Cabinet in April this year. The core of the plan consists of "three main strategies and four lines of defense."
The three strategies include "flu vaccines, antiviral drugs and public-health intervention."
At the moment, the international community is starting to work on researching and developing an H5N1 vaccine. If mass production for the market becomes a reality, the vaccine will be administered first and foremost on high-risk groups and those responsible for maintaining law and order in society.
In terms of antiviral drugs, the goal is to stock up on enough drugs to innoculate 10 percent of the population and we will attempt R&D in manufacturing technologies for antiviral drugs. In addition, we have stockpiled a substantial quantity of safety equipment and protective gear. We have also planned for isolated treatment facilities and possible measures to restrict school, work and mass activities during a pandemic.
The four lines of defense include "battles abroad, broader quarantine, health management in community and a sound health-care system."
The DOH is working vigorously with other countries to block any infection from spreading to Taiwan. We will continue with quarantine measures that have been put in place at airports and seaports after the SARS outbreak, such as thermal monitoring. Furthermore, we are building up consensus and marshaling manpower in the community for better health management. At the same time, we are constructing a health-care network for epidemic control.
In order to enhance cross-departmental collaboration and understanding of the standard procedures, the DOH has adopted the concept of military drills for disease-control mobilization. The DOH has devised a possible course of development for the flu epidemic and conducted a drill for a Level A2 pandemic situation (ie, suspected human infections of avian flu in Taiwan) on July 7 this year. The highly successful drill included devising operational strategies, quarantine of travelers from epidemic areas, investigation into the magnitude of the crisis and hospitalization of suspected cases.
I traveled to Washington recently where a flu pandemic was the focus of my discussions -- even the US did not have the confidence to declare that it was fully prepared for a pandemic. The US is willing to work with our government in preventing novel influenza.
After the dreadful experience of dealing with the SARS outbreak in Taiwan in 2003, the DOH is wary of a new pandemic and is determined to be a global leader in preparing for the crisis. We urge the public to trust the authorities, to pay attention to information released by the government and to follow the prescribed preventive measures.
On the whole, a pandemic caused by the novel influenza bacteria is likely to occur, even though we are unable to predict the exact time of its occurrence.
However, through analysis of data that are currently available, the number of novel influenza infections in both humans and animals are on the rise. Researchers have also discovered incidents of mass outbreak and suspected human-to-human transmission. As a result, most experts believe that the novel-influenza strain H5N1 is undergoing continuous changes and is becoming more flexible in adapting to the human body. Consequently, they believe the next pandemic is just around the corner.
Such a pandemic will bring unprecedented disruption to the economic and social security systems as well as health care services, even causing them to shut down or disintegrate. We are at a critical point in history to respond to a pandemic. We are running against time in our preparation for the looming crisis. The health authorities alone cannot accomplish the mission, and even cross-departmental collaboration cannot reverse the tide. Only with public consensus and support for government regulations and guidelines can we can minimize losses in what threatens to be the pandemic of the century.
Hou Sheng-mou is the minister of the Department of Health.
US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing. For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability. Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
US president-elect Donald Trump in an interview with NBC News on Monday said he would “never say” if the US is committed to defending Taiwan against China. Trump said he would “prefer” that China does not attempt to invade Taiwan, and that he has a “very good relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Before committing US troops to defending Taiwan he would “have to negotiate things,” he said. This is a departure from the stance of incumbent US President Joe Biden, who on several occasions expressed resolutely that he would commit US troops in the event of a conflict in
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —