The turbidity of the water in the Shihmen Reservoir (
The recent water supply problem in Taoyuan County came in the wake of Typhoon Matsa on Aug. 5, and it was a recurrence of the problems caused by Typhoon Mindulle last July.
Also, flash floods bringing turbid water into the Touchien River (
By the same token, certain cities and counties in the south, such as Kaohsiung and Pingtung, are facing similar problems. But the public has a short memory for such problems.
After a prolonged drought last month and this one, southern Taiwan was looking forward to rain showers to relieve the drought.
Unfortunately, what came after were the devastations of the June 12 flooding and Typhoon Haitang on July 18.
The turbidity of water in the Kaoping River (
The turbidity of the off-stream Nanhua Reservoir (
Despite the Taiwan Water Corp's (TWC) all-out efforts to restore the water supply at an early date, hundreds of residents in Kaohsiung City's Tsuiping Borough recently had their water cut off for as long as seven days.
TWC officials have already announced that water shortages will be a recurring problem in Taoyuan because of a high water turbidity level resulting from typhoons and torrential rains.
The Pingting Water Treatment Plant (
It was found that the silt content was between 45,360 tonnes to 90,718 tonnes a day, accounting for one-fifth of the total volume.
How could such turbid water be used? Would building more sedimentation tanks be of any help?
About 80 years ago during the Japanese period, a Japanese engineer used hydraulic engineering techniques to construct the Erfeng Ditch (
The thinking behind the construction of the ditch in the region originated from the recurring flooding and drought problems in areas near the Taiwan Sugar Corp's Wanlung Farm (
The Erfeng Ditch, an underground water intake structure, was built at the headwater of the Linpien River, which is currently located 100m upstream of the Laiyi Bridge (
The construction of the Erfeng Ditch was completed within two years, and its water intake structures include four different parts: trapezoid water diversion weirs, semi-circle underground watersheds, arched channels, and water-gathering towers.
The complex constructions cannot be seen above ground since they are under the riverbed.
During the first decade after the completion of the Erfeng Ditch, the water supply was as much as 228,610 tonnes during the rainy season.
Although the ditch was partially damaged, its water supply can still reach 74,390 tonnes per day, an amount higher than the Ahgungtien Reservoir (
Basically, the Erfeng Ditch is an underground water diversion weir under the riverbed.
Since surface water goes through permeable sand and gravel as a natural filtration process, even during periods of heavy rainfalls or typhoons causing high water turbidity, the Erfeng Ditch can still have supply clear water.
Faced with the long-term failure to reduce the turbidity of the water supply during periods of heavy rainfall, the government should reflect on the reason why even after a large expenditure of money on large-scale hydraulic engineering projects, such as constructions of dams and water diversion weirs, the water shortages remain a recurring problem.
There are two other possibilities to help gather clean water: building the Kaotai Reservoir (
But would these two projects simply be high-investment projects that yield low returns?
My purpose in this article is not to praise the successful hydraulic techniques used in constructing the Erfeng Ditch.
Instead, I want to use the Erfeng Ditch as a reminder that if the water turbidity problems after heavy rain continue, the government's stubborn belief in the construction of weirs and dams should be discarded.
Instead, the government should find a way for effective water resource management that can truly benefit the nation.
Also, it would probably be a way to stop future water stoppages during the rainy season.
Lee Ken-cheng is the chief of the Kaohsiung Teachers Association's Ecological Education Center.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS