I was flabbergasted to read your report ("Students at risk of suicide," Aug. 7, page 3). In it, you write that according to a recent survey sponsored by the Taiwan Association of Clinical Psychiatrists, 10.21 percent of the students surveyed "have attempted suicide in the past year." Are you absolutely sure of this figure?
I have often found that students do not understand the literal meaning of "suicide" and "to commit suicide." I care very much about the fine distinctions here because the proper use of terminology affects attitudes and behavior. Don't you really mean that 10 percent of the students in the survey "have thought at one time or the other of taking their life," or "have had occasional suicidal thoughts"? Do you really mean that high a percentage of young people in the survey actually tried to do this awful thing? I find the notion very hard to believe.
During times of unusual stress, sadness or discouragement, or for persons suffering clinical depression, it may be natural for people to have a fleeting fantasy of say, hurling themselves in front of a passing car or of throwing away the precious gift of their own life. But thank heavens most of us recognize nonsense when we see it, and we let go of such fantasies or thoughts. We do not act on them.
Please tell us, then: does that survey really mean what you reported? Also, was the survey taken among a certain select group of young people, or was it a random survey? Finally, how was the survey conducted?
Father Daniel Bauer
Fu Jen Catholic University
[For answers to these questions, readers should try contacting the Taiwan Association of Clinical Psychiatrists, which conducted the survey, at 03-2653445. - Ed.]
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS