Next month President Chen Shui-bian (
He has invited the leaders of the four main political parties, Taipei Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman-elect Ma Ying-jeou (
His purpose in doing this is to achieve a foreign policy consensus among the major political parties to more effectively resist China's attempts to isolate Taiwan diplomatically.
Predictably, the green camp has been eager to fall in with the president's plans, while the blue camp has shown a distinct lack of enthusiasm. Ma has said that he is too busy, while PFP spokesperson Hsieh Kung-ping (
He said that while international diplomacy is important, more immediate questions -- the cross-strait issue, the economy and domestic issues -- are in complete disarray, and the president should give priority to these urgent matters which impinge directly on the lives of the Taiwanese people.
Shu said he fully approved of the president's invitation to opposition leaders to help make diplomatic headway. Su also enthusiastically endorsed the president's move, saying that by inviting opposition leaders, we could show our allies Taiwan's democratic achievements and the unity of the Taiwanese people.
He added that even if the political parties had domestic differences, they should stand together when overseas.
He also scolded Ma, saying that while it was essential to keep abreast of domestic administration, promoting Taiwan's foreign policy was also essential.
What results a joint delegation of Taiwan's political leaders might achieve on the diplomatic front remains to be seen, but this must certainly be recognized as something of a first in international diplomacy and an imaginative attempt by the government to break out of the diplomatic isolation that China seeks to impose on Taiwan.
That the opposition leaders have automatically rejected this offer as a reflex action is disappointing.
We call on the opposition leaders to accept Chen's offer, and put down, even temporarily, their inter-party feuds to work together for Taiwan's interests overseas.
By next month, Ma will have officially taken up his post as KMT chairman, so if he were to accept Chen's offer to visit Central America, this would certainly help establish a new basis of cooperation between the DPP and KMT, and mark a clean break from outgoing KMT Chairman Lien Chan's (連戰) policy of resisting Chen at every opportunity, which has already done so much harm to the country.
Ma's acceptance would offer a ray of hope that Taiwan can achieve political harmony, and would also be an affirmation of Taiwan's determination, encompassing both ruling and opposition parties, to resist China.
Taking a neutral view of the issue based on a will to promote national interests, it would be difficult for opposition leaders to refuse Chen's invitation.
In March this year, China passed the "Anti-Secession" Law which allows its military to use "non-peaceful means" to deal with Taiwan if it does not give in to China's ambition to annex it. Despite the savagery inherent in such a law, the pan-blue leaders refused to participate in demonstrations against it.
Instead, they accepted invitations from Chinese President Hu Jintao (
We cannot help but wonder on what grounds pan-blue leaders -- who are readily prepared to settle their differences with the formerly hated Chinese Communist Party (CCP) -- can refuse to temporarily set aside their differences with the popularly elected Chen and join him in promoting Taiwan's foreign policy.
Intense opposition and diverging opinions exist in all democratic countries, but when it comes to national defense, foreign policy and other matters involving other states, there should be unity and everyone should work with the national interest in mind.
In particular, Ma, who calls himself a reformer, should move forward, away from past intense opposition between the blue and green camps and instead listen directly to grassroots opinion.
Five years after the power transition, the intense inter-party struggle that centers around the dislike between Lien and Soong on the one hand and Chen on the other is once again coming to the fore.
The public is heartily sick of this. But Soong's influence is waning and Lien is about to retire and pass the baton to Ma. If Ma is willing to accept Chen's invitation, there is a real chance that we could see an end to inter-party hatred, resolve the political deadlock and put an end to the public's nightmare.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Ian Bartholomew
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS