Ever since Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
According to Article 3 of the "Nomination Regulations Governing the KMT's Rank and File Intending to Run for Public Office," the KMT's Central Committee has the right to decide who can represent the party in the presidential race based on the outcome of a rank-and-file vote (50 percent) and on a public opinion survey (50 percent).
One of the regulations also stipulates that, if necessary, the party can nominate a non-KMT member as a vice presidential candidate. Since Ma garnered 71.51 percent of the vote in the chairmanship election, few will be able to challenge his bid if he decides to contest for the party's presidential candidate in 2007. As for public opinion, Ma shouldn't have much trouble there either.
Who is qualified to be the party's vice presidential candidate? Ma will very probably select a respected pan-blue Hoklo politician from central or southern Taiwan as his running mate. Whether the vice presidential candidate has local grassroots support may not be a primary consideration, in view of the format of the presidential election.
According to the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) Articles for Nominating Candidates for Public Office, support of the rank and file (30 percent) and the result of a public opinion survey (70 percent) are the two major elements used to decide who can become the party's presidential and vice presidential candidates. Under this nomination system, the more charismatic a candidate is, the more likely it is that he or she will come out ahead.
When the DPP nominated its presidential candidate in 1999, the public opinion survey greatly outweighed the evaluation of the candidates conducted by the DPP's rank-and-file and cadre members. Thus, I believe that in 2007, if the nomination mechanism remains in place, the overall popularity of both the DPP's and the KMT 's presidential candidates will dictate whether he or she will be nominated by the party. Under these circumstances, candidates who enjoy the greatest popularity will be able to win the backing of the party elite.
Additionally, the seventh legislative elections, which will precede the 2008 presidential election, are also going to be crucial as the "single-member district, two-vote system" will be adopted for the first time. As such, the presidential hopefuls are likely to get out and stump for the legislative candidates to test the waters. At that point, it will be difficult to tell whether they are canvassing support for themselves or for the legislative candidates.
More importantly, the party that gains the majority of seats in the legislative elections will get a boost in the presidential elections that follow -- meaning that the fate of the presidential candidates will be closely related to the outcome of the legislative elections.
In short, both the green and blue camps are likely to establish a nominating mechanism that allows public opinion surveys to play a more important role in selecting their presidential candidates. These types of measures are unique to the development of democracy in Taiwan and, with this kind of nomination system, we can already get a clear idea what kind of presidential candidates we are likely to get.
Wang Yeh-li is a professor in the department of political science at Tunghai University.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS