Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
He is the key to the KMT's future, for without superstar Ma, the KMT would become an empty shell, and even its legitimacy as a party might come into question. As a result, Ma had no choice but to contest the KMT chairmanship election.
Although not the sole determinant, Ma's Mainlander origins were a crucial factor contributing to his overwhelming victory over Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平). Given this "moral imperative," no one was able to hold back Ma's ambitions, and the triumvirate of Wang, outgoing KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), pales beside Ma's overwhelming presence. That's why Ma was able to garner more than 70 percent of the vote.
Ma's victory was simply a necessary step arranged by the party toward winning the 2008 presidential election. After all, the KMT's ultimate goal is to reclaim power. Such is their impatience that when the dust had barely settled from the election, the blue-camp was already setting up Ma as their 2008 candidate. This kind of myth-making is likely to prove to be Ma's Achilles heel.
There are two myths being built around Ma.
First, because the votes Ma garnered in the election were not all from Mainlanders -- since 70 percent is much larger than the proportion of Mainlanders in the party -- some say this indicates that Ma's appeal has crossed the ethnic divide. But has it? Let us consider the issue from Wang's perspective. Prior to the election, the Wang camp predicted that it could rely on the veterans' vote (180,000) and that of their families, accounting for a solid 500,000 votes.
After the election, Wang told American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Douglas Paal that the KMT only has slightly more than 700,000 members, considerably less that the 1.04 million it had previously claimed. He said Ma's votes came primarily from Mainlanders and that members with a localization bent had either failed to vote or left the party. This suggestion echoes former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) belief that Wang's pro-China stance caused many of his supporters to pull back.
In fact, the KMT keeps track of voter information and could break the figures down by ethnic group. But Ma would not want to do this, and if he did, he certainly would not make the information public. Fortunately, we can draw our information from other sources, and anecdotal and media evidence suggests that Mainlanders came out to vote in force. Could Ma have won without this source of support?
The other myth is that support for Ma has crossed the Chuoshui River, the nominal line separating northern Taiwan from the south. This suggests that Ma not only had an overwhelming victory in the north, in places such as Taipei City, Taipei County and Taoyuan County, but also led by a landslide (more than 80 percent) in the south.
Kaohsiung County's Mainlander strongholds, such as Fengshan (
Ma's supporters do not wish to look at the facts. Instead, they are intent on building a mythic web around him, showering him with glory and making an early start on his campaign for the 2008 election.
Chin Heng-wei is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS