The race between Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
The question of whether or not the KMT is a party that only represents Mainlanders has recently become a topic of heated discussion.
As a Mainlander living in Taiwan, I would like to provide my views on the question: The KMT is indeed a party dominated by a handful of narrow-minded, obstinate and repulsive Mainlanders. Although the KMT rank- and-file is mainly composed of Hoklo and Hakka, it is still considered by many of them a party that belongs solely to Mainlanders.
During the political unrest following last year's presidential election, the mob supportive of the pan-blue camp lingered on Ketagalan Boulevard for weeks and targeted the KMT's Hoklo political figures for verbal abuse and intimidation.
Even though he is the legislative speaker and KMT vice-chairman, Wang was physically threatened, an indication of how this group of people looks down on the Taiwanese and how antagonistic they are toward the Hoklo.
It was a similar situation when Han Chinese served as government officials during the reign of the Qing Dynasty. Despite their high position, they were regarded by the Manchu as no more than stooges.
In all honesty, this clique of people directing the KMT have cast a spell over the foolish Mainlanders, mesmerizing them to uphold the "Republic of China" and a "Chinese nation."
But what really baffles me is that there are still a large number of Hoklo willing to cast their ballots to support a political party that is fundamentally antagonistic to them.
Wang is more capable of maintaining the party as one that is able to represent the will of the party's entire membership. If Ma wins the election with the support of most of the Mainlander KMT veterans, he will never be able to shake off the party's stereotyped image of being a Mainlander's party.
Once I read a book dealing with British people living in Singapore who fell in love with the nation.
After Singapore declared independence, these British people, some of whom even served as government officials during the colonial period, chose to stay there and became Singaporeans.
When the British were ruling India, quite a few appeared haughty and superior.
However, many of them also developed an affection and love for the nation and began to dedicate themselves to studies of the hydrology of the Ganges River, the Himalayas and Sanskrit. Some of the British public servants and soldiers even localized their eating habits and lifestyles and considered India their second home without feeling disgraced.
Although the degree to which British people identified themselves with India may have differed from person to person, they were not antagonistic to the country in which they chose to live.
We wonder then: how come Mainlanders who fled to Taiwan more than half a century ago still despise the people who cared for them and distance themselves from the sovereign nation that has been sheltering them?
While electing the next party chairman, KMT members should elect the candidate who can truly represent Taiwan, rather than one who continues to oppose Taiwanese independence and projects an image as a foreign but superior being.
David Ming is a political commentator and author of Heartfelt Wishes of a Citizen.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS