A people who have suffered under long-term oppression at the hands of a foreign power often begin to see themselves as second-class citizens, and feel subservient to their foreign political leaders. In severe cases this can come to resemble what is known as Stockholm Syndrome, where the people actually recognize the legitimacy of the oppressors, start to pander to them and feel the need to please them. After a while, they start to feel at ease in their new reality, and are even content when shown small acts of generosity.
Over the past few months, the foreign Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has been holding its chairmanship contest, and the competition between the two candidates, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), egged on by the media, has been getting more and more heated.
Now, this is their own affair, but Wang, who was born and raised in Taiwan, has been pulling out all the stops in his criticism and misrepresentation of former president Lee Teng-hui's (
To improve his chances of winning the chairmanship, Wang even went to Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall and swore before the bronze bust there that he opposed Taiwanese independence. This was simply pandering to the Mainlander elements within the party, in a bid to secure more votes for his candidacy.
When he was still alive, Sun Yat-sen (
Wang is trying to draw an ideological line between himself and Lee. He has clearly abandoned any idea of autonomy for the Taiwanese people. He opposes the idea of rectifying Taiwan's name in favor of maintaining the false name of the Republic of China (ROC). But does this really offer any guarantee that China will refrain from using military force against Taiwan?
Wang is opposed to the rectification of Taiwan's name, he is against writing a new constitution and he rejects the idea of Taiwanese independence -- and yet he shows no objection to the barbaric legislation that is China's "Anti-Secession" Law. Could it really be that Wang wants to follow in the footsteps of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and allow China to swallow up Taiwan by colluding with the communists against the pro-independence parties?
If Taiwan is not an independent nation, how does one explain the existence of the legislature? Why not downgrade it to the status of a legislative council? In fact, why not lower the status of Wang himself, as he is really only the speaker of the legislative council of a special region.
If Wang opposes the idea that Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation, how can he commandeer a warship to protect our fishing rights? And what of Taiwan's international status?
Wang is the speaker of the legislature, yet he betrays an ignorance of politics and fails to recognize Taiwan as a nation in its own right. Again, it's no wonder that the legislature is sinking further and further into the mire as time goes on.
Right before our eyes, Taiwanese politicians within the pan-blue camp show they are willing to be second-class figures, hold back from speaking their minds and let themselves become Sinicized. They are turning into two-faced people whose words reflect what is expedient depending on the circumstances they are in.
A people governed by a foreign power often harbor a sense of guilt and are afraid of offending their oppressors. This self-abasement has been manifested in the recent pandering to Beijing's talk of peace by these Taiwanese politicians, who are suppressing their own sense of national identity. Such politicians are in desperate need of help to correct the distorted way in which they see things. It's up to Taiwanese who see things more clearly to save them.
William J.K. Lo is secretary-general of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS