The 80-year history of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is a history of "drawing pies to satisfy hunger," as the old saying goes. People's cries could be heard everywhere in China after the notorious Great Leap Forward in the late 1950s. But the CCP still upheld its glorious communist vision. Even after communism became bankrupt, China has not given up so-called "communist" ideals, and has constantly drawn other pies to satisfy people's hunger.
As a result, talk of the "four modernizations" to a "well-off society," and a "well-off society in an all-round way," amount to little more than smoke and mirrors.
But Chinese President Hu Jintao's (胡錦濤) proposal of a "harmonious society" is a breakthrough compared to his predecessors. Hu has vowed to build a socialist society that is, "democratic and law-based, fair and just, trustworthy and friendly, full of vigor and vitality, secure and orderly, and in which man and nature are in harmony."
His definition is somewhat of a departure from the emphasis on economic development 20 years ago, and it also carries an active meaning. By stating that the goal for society is to become "democratic and law-based," and "fair and just," it shows that rational forces inside the CCP are beginning to acknowledge the regime's contradictions, and its realizes that the country's democratic deficit will inevitably lead to social conflict.
Still, hoping for a harmonious society does not mean that it will become reality. Weren't communism, the "four modernizations," and other appealing terms just slogans? It is doubtful that the CCP will go through any significant political transition. It's all well and good for Hu to make democracy a priority, but it is just lip service. People should not be overly excited.
Democratic slogans are nothing new in the CCP's history. It is hard to decipher what Hu actually means when he calls for greater democracy. The term "democracy" was also repeatedly evoked by Jiang Zemin (江澤民), Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) and even Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ironically, their democratic slogans were always accompanied by an authoritarian system that consolidated control over Chinese society. We do not know whether Hu's democracy refers to a democratic society, "democratic centralism," or a system in name only.
After Hu proposed his harmonious society, CCP mouthpieces embarked on a campaign of flattery. Due to Beijing's attempt to unify public opinion, it has been repeating Hu's words while trying to downplay moves toward actual democracy.
Meanwhile, dissidents who dare to speak the truth are promptly jailed. Such an environment can hardly convince others that a harmonious society can be built successfully, because Beijing's propaganda offensive is actually one of the causes of an inharmonious society.
A democratic society is the only polity that ensures fairness, harmony and stability. There are no other alternatives. Russian President Vladimir Putin claims that his country will not carry out "Russian-style democracy," but will follow the democratic principles practiced in most of the world. But such global democratic principles are taboo in China, despite the fact that Chinese officials no longer views with distain the concepts of democracy, freedom, and human rights.
It is questionable whether Beijing's desire to move toward democracy is genuine.
Wang Dan is a member of the Taipei Society.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS