On Wednesday President Chen Shui-bian (
The salient point about the 1937-45 war between China and Japan is that it was fought in a foreign country -- China -- and the Taiwanese, as colonial subjects of the Japanese Empire, were in fact on the other side. Their involvement in the war in China was limited due to there being no conscription in Taiwan until very late in the war. Most Taiwanese who served in the Japanese military did so in the Pacific theater, rather than China. As far as the Taiwanese are concerned, they won no victory in 1945.
That they were on the side of brutally militaristic Japan, albeit not voluntarily, is not something to be proud of. As a result, many Taiwanese have been willing to accept the rewriting of history by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime which occupied the country after 1945. In this revision, China fought Japan, Taiwan was part of China, and so Taiwan must have fought Japan too. This, of course, is nonsense. But unfortunately it is another example of the false consciousness and muddled sense of identification imbued in Taiwanese by half a century as the colonial subjects of the "Republic of China."
One of the problems with Taiwan's political changes over the last 15 years is that while it might have democratized, it has never successfully decolonized. Part of the problem is that few Taiwanese seem to understand their situation as a colonial one. They have been taught that the colonial yoke was lifted in 1945, and only the highly politically sophisticated can readily see that what happened in 1945 was that one colonial tutelage was replaced by another. Consequently the Democratic Progressive Party's status as a liberation movement has never been clearly defined, and is little understood even in the DPP itself -- except at the most rarefied levels of political discourse.
The result has been a pitiful lack of zeal to effect that change in consciousness that liberation movements usually seek to effect as quickly as possible. Out go the statues, the festivals, the historical and cultural icons of the colonial power, to be replaced with an alternative set belonging to the liberated domestic polity. In Taiwan this reshaping of the national consciousness has been patchy at best. Some good work has been done by the Ministry of Education, while the military, for example, has barely been dragged into the post-martial law age. Until last year the armed forces were still singing songs about "liberating the mainland."
The armed forces used to be the private army of the KMT and their "nationalization" is, DPP government officials say, a sensitive issue which must be done very gradually. Actually this is rubbish. All that was needed was a purge of officers who would not renounce political party membership and swear a new oath of allegiance to Taiwan. This would have weeded out the pro-China unificationists and the KMT party-army loyalists, and left Taiwan with an officer corps with far less questionable loyalties than it currently has.
But the military is is simply a mirror of the wider society; Taiwanese consciousness needs strengthening everywhere. Instead what we see is Chen doing exactly the opposite: buying into and reinforcing a view of history that is fundamentally detrimental to Taiwan.
After all, if the armed forces really beat the Japanese then they are China's soldiers, not Taiwan's -- in which case their loyalty has to be questioned. If they are really the armed forces of Taiwan, then the events of 60 years ago are irrelevant. Why can't Chen understand that?
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS