One cannot help help but be impressed by the extent to which Beijing has mastered and refined the art of the propaganda. Within a few months, the Chinese government has managed to crawl out of the hole that it had dug itself with the passage of its "Anti-Secession" Law, and has painted an illusory yet rosy picture about not just the state of cross-strait relations but also its own regime.
According to an international survey conducted by the US-based Pew Research Center for the People, in many countries, China is viewed more favorably than the US. This raises the concern that China's improved image will go a long way in helping it convince the international community to accept the "one China" policy.
This is of course not good news for Taiwan. While the "favorable" image most likely does not reflect China's domestic and diplomatic actions, Beijing is now in a position to manipulate this image to further isolate Taiwan and convince the international community that the cross-strait relationship is an "internal affair" over which foreign countries such as the US and Japan should not meddle.
Ironically, Beijing has a lot of people to thank within Taiwan for the success of its propaganda offensive. Right after the enactment of the Anti Secession Law, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Many commentators within Taiwan agreed that the farce successfully created the illusion that the Taiwanese people are "not that angry" with Beijing, thereby easing mounting international pressure against the Chinese government.
The Lien and Soong trips opened a Pandora's box of unauthorized negotiations with Beijing. In the past, such talks were typically carried out in secret. These days, people just don't care about the authority of the government, and will deal with China with or without government authorization.
If cross-strait relations had genuinely improved after the China visits, then perhaps the pan-blue camp's bout of "freelance diplomacy" would have been worth it. But this is simply not the case. Beijing's policy toward Taiwan has remained the same.
On Friday, Mainland Affairs Council Vice Chairman You Ying-lung (
The documents also characterizes the cross-strait relationship as "grim" and directs the People's Liberation Army to maintain a high degree of combat readiness.
The content of this document is consistent with the findings of a national security report recently submitted to President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). The report also stated that if Beijing launched a military campaign against Taiwan, it will most likely target the nation's non-military infrastructure, such as water purification plants, electricity grids and banking institutions during the first wave of its attack, with the intent of demoralizing the people and striking at their will to resist the invasion. Appropriately, the government has promptly decided to improve and integrate its disaster relief system to help defend against such actions.
It is sad to see that so many Taiwanese people have lost sight of China's military ambitions and are susceptible to its unificationist propaganda. This level of naivety is a growing problem for the country.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS