The recent scandal surrounding People First Party (PFP) Taipei City Councilor and talk show host Mike Wang (
Wang made false (and likely intentional) accusations against six local restaurants. He accused them of selling or reselling food purchased from funeral parlors. The allegation later turned out to be manufactured by members of the city councilor's staff. Although Wang has refused to step down from his post and has blamed the incident on his underlings, the fiasco nonetheless illustrates the unhealthy relationship between politicians and the media.
In today's world of 24-hour news and instant information, where public opinion can change in a flash and missteps are magnified to grandiose proportions, the role of the press should be not only descriptive but also educational.
Regretfully, most people live in the real world, with their hopes, fears, dreams and anxieties, but they are not very good at figuring complex political matters. This leaves rooms for some self-interested politicians to maneuver and exploit the public.
The idea that the media has the power to mold public opinion drives editors, reporters and talk-show hosts to exaggerate and even make up news. Even though the public has complained about this kind of behavior, the people who complain are usually the type of people who are not so influenced by it.
The decades of change in Taiwanese politics and growing press freedom have given birth to intense competition and a decline in the quality of media coverage. Considering that things in Taiwan are so often politicized, the media has gradually lost its focus. Instead, we are seeing a lack of professionalism and an over-emphasis on trivial or sensationalized stories.
As the media gradually loses its self-discipline, it is increasingly becoming a tool for politicians and people with vested interests. Media managers and politicians often believe that newspapers and TV news are all-powerful. But they are wrong. Both believe that politicians are very effective in manipulating what the media says. Wrong again. They are deeply convinced that the media can easily lead voters. Still wrong.
Because of the biased media culture, all parties related to the Mike Wang fraud case automatically fell into the typical cycle of political maneuvering. But the public eventually got the truth in the end -- and they responded. The Wang incident serves as the best example of how the public can hit back.
Opinion polls show that people have become highly suspicious of the media and increasingly sophisticated in spotting its attempts at manipulation. The public now sees the media as a kind of special-interest group, no more objective or independent than any other social group in presenting its view.
Perhaps this is the best time to reform the media. To construct a well-established and institutionalized media culture, several approaches must be taken, and some positive steps have already been made. Through the Radio and Television Law (
Also, the public should exert pressure on politicians and political parties to withdraw from operating or having influence on media firms. People like Wang should cut ties with the press.
Institutional reform is only the first step in providing a fair and competitive environment for the media. Public action constitutes the key to mature media competition. Finally, strengthening public TV would also serve as a model to purify the media culture.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS