On a recent visit to China and Taiwan, the question most frequently posed to me was "Can a Chen-Hu summit be realized?"
In the aftermath of the trips to China by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Should Taipei and Beijing seek to arrange a summit between their leaders?
A Hu-Chen meeting is a worthy goal to strive for, but it must be well prepared. Moreover, rather than the first step in a process of improving cross-strait relations, such a summit should be the culmination of mutual efforts to ease tensions and build confidence between the two sides.
A hastily prepared summit arranged simply for the sake of holding a summit could be politically risky for both leaders. In the wake of the visits to China by Lien and Soong, Chen faces growing pressure from within the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to not compromise on core party principles in order to achieve a breakthrough with China.
Without a consensus in his party on the basis for seeking reconciliation with China, a summit could irreparably divide the DPP and diminish its chances for winning the presidential election in 2008. Moreover, if the pan-blue parties were dissatisfied with the outcome of an early summit, the goal of forging an inter-party consensus on policy toward China could become unattainable.
Hu is vulnerable on the Taiwan issue. A summit that is not carefully orchestrated could result in surprises that weaken rather than strengthen Hu's position. An unsuccessful meeting with Chen could create opportunities for Hu's critics to press for a tougher stance toward Taiwan, including the use of military force.
Rather than lay the groundwork for sustained improvement in cross-strait relations, an inadequately prepared Hu-Chen meeting could even cause a deterioration of ties between Beijing and Taipei.
A series of steps to build mutual trust should precede a meeting between Chinese and Taiwanese leaders. Realizing direct cargo flights between the two sides of the Strait, increased agricultural exports from Taiwan to China, and tourism by Chinese to Taiwan through negotiations between private civilian and commercial organizations would aid in promoting greater cross-strait interaction and confidence.
Premier Frank Hsieh's recent announcement that Taiwan will authorize the Taipei Airlines Association (TAA) to negotiate with its Chinese counterpart to open direct cross-strait charter cargo flights and the Taiwan External Trade Development Council (TAITRA) to discuss with its Chinese counterpart the shipment of Taiwanese agricultural products to China are welcome measures in this regard. Negotiations should also begin between commercial and civilian organizations to establish regular direct commercial cross-strait flights.
Differences on political issues must be narrowed as well. An authorized cross-strait channel should be set up to develop realistic mutual approaches to dealing with sensitive issues such as sovereignty and defining the nature of the relationship of the existing governments and peoples on the two sides of the Strait. A quiet discussion of flexible phrasing and other measures that will enable both sides to move forward should take place between sanctioned individuals to enhance the chances for success.
If agreement can be reached on removing the various obstacles to stable and improved cross-strait relations, the basis will have been laid for a meeting between Hu and Chen to celebrate the progress achieved.
Undoubtedly some will interpret my suggestions as evidence of US fears that reconciliation between China and Taiwan could lead to unification at the expense of US interests. However, it is my view that Washington would welcome the elimination of the danger of a war in which it is likely to be involved, and in which US interests would almost certainly be adversely affected.
Bonnie Glaser is a senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington and its Hawaii-based Pacific Forum.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS