On a recent visit to China and Taiwan, the question most frequently posed to me was "Can a Chen-Hu summit be realized?"
In the aftermath of the trips to China by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Should Taipei and Beijing seek to arrange a summit between their leaders?
A Hu-Chen meeting is a worthy goal to strive for, but it must be well prepared. Moreover, rather than the first step in a process of improving cross-strait relations, such a summit should be the culmination of mutual efforts to ease tensions and build confidence between the two sides.
A hastily prepared summit arranged simply for the sake of holding a summit could be politically risky for both leaders. In the wake of the visits to China by Lien and Soong, Chen faces growing pressure from within the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to not compromise on core party principles in order to achieve a breakthrough with China.
Without a consensus in his party on the basis for seeking reconciliation with China, a summit could irreparably divide the DPP and diminish its chances for winning the presidential election in 2008. Moreover, if the pan-blue parties were dissatisfied with the outcome of an early summit, the goal of forging an inter-party consensus on policy toward China could become unattainable.
Hu is vulnerable on the Taiwan issue. A summit that is not carefully orchestrated could result in surprises that weaken rather than strengthen Hu's position. An unsuccessful meeting with Chen could create opportunities for Hu's critics to press for a tougher stance toward Taiwan, including the use of military force.
Rather than lay the groundwork for sustained improvement in cross-strait relations, an inadequately prepared Hu-Chen meeting could even cause a deterioration of ties between Beijing and Taipei.
A series of steps to build mutual trust should precede a meeting between Chinese and Taiwanese leaders. Realizing direct cargo flights between the two sides of the Strait, increased agricultural exports from Taiwan to China, and tourism by Chinese to Taiwan through negotiations between private civilian and commercial organizations would aid in promoting greater cross-strait interaction and confidence.
Premier Frank Hsieh's recent announcement that Taiwan will authorize the Taipei Airlines Association (TAA) to negotiate with its Chinese counterpart to open direct cross-strait charter cargo flights and the Taiwan External Trade Development Council (TAITRA) to discuss with its Chinese counterpart the shipment of Taiwanese agricultural products to China are welcome measures in this regard. Negotiations should also begin between commercial and civilian organizations to establish regular direct commercial cross-strait flights.
Differences on political issues must be narrowed as well. An authorized cross-strait channel should be set up to develop realistic mutual approaches to dealing with sensitive issues such as sovereignty and defining the nature of the relationship of the existing governments and peoples on the two sides of the Strait. A quiet discussion of flexible phrasing and other measures that will enable both sides to move forward should take place between sanctioned individuals to enhance the chances for success.
If agreement can be reached on removing the various obstacles to stable and improved cross-strait relations, the basis will have been laid for a meeting between Hu and Chen to celebrate the progress achieved.
Undoubtedly some will interpret my suggestions as evidence of US fears that reconciliation between China and Taiwan could lead to unification at the expense of US interests. However, it is my view that Washington would welcome the elimination of the danger of a war in which it is likely to be involved, and in which US interests would almost certainly be adversely affected.
Bonnie Glaser is a senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington and its Hawaii-based Pacific Forum.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS