Taiwan's bid to enter the World Health Organization (WHO) failed for the ninth straight time during the World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting last month. Before the meeting, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
In this year's meeting, China changed its harsh tone, and adopted a more sophisticated method to block Taiwan's participation. During the meeting, Beijing and the WHO Secretariat signed a memorandum of understanding without Taipei's approval, painting Taiwan's bid as a "domestic" Chinese issue in order to create the false impression in the international community that Taiwan is a part of China.
We can see from these tricks that China has long excluded Taiwan from the WHO due to political factors, and it can no longer justify itself. Besides, it is necessary for Beijing to remedy its international image after the resentment caused by the "Anti-Secession" Law.
In this year's meeting, China used the statements of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Meanwhile, since the WHO was also attempting to launch the International Health Regulations (IHR), our diplomatic and health agencies had to fight on two different fronts. They finally paved the way for Taiwan to take part in the IHR -- a positive result.
The WHO Constitution clearly states, "The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition." But Taiwan, after so much effort, is still unable to join the organization due to China's interference.
Although the inclusion of the principle of universal application in the IHR has opened a window of opportunity for Taiwan's participation, will it really enable the country to be involved in international health affairs and have regular contact with the WHO? We should still be cautious about irrational Chinese political interference.
It has been nine years since Taiwan launched its first bid. The legitimacy of its bid has increased after experiencing both an enterovirus epidemic and SARS. But it is undeniable that, apart from China's vicious oppression, the lack of a consensus inside Taiwan is also one of the obstacles affecting our bid.
Still, since Taiwan needs to gain support from foreign countries during this process, our diplomats have a great opportunity to develop relationships with their foreign counterparts, rather than focusing only on unilateral relationships with the US and Japan. The Department of Health (DOH) also repeatedly sent its officials to observe at WHO-related committees, and it now has a better understanding of international health cooperation.
The experience of jointly pushing for participation in the WHO has allowed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the DOH to work more closely together. The public has also realized that Taiwan should not exclude itself from the global village, and is willing to offer more medical aid to developing countries. In the future, health, democracy and business diplomacy will become the three major pillars of Taiwan's international relations.
Taiwan's frustrated bid to join the WHO was therefore not a failure. It opened up infinite possibilities for our diplomacy.
Wu Shuh-min is the president of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS