Taiwan's bid to enter the World Health Organization (WHO) failed for the ninth straight time during the World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting last month. Before the meeting, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
In this year's meeting, China changed its harsh tone, and adopted a more sophisticated method to block Taiwan's participation. During the meeting, Beijing and the WHO Secretariat signed a memorandum of understanding without Taipei's approval, painting Taiwan's bid as a "domestic" Chinese issue in order to create the false impression in the international community that Taiwan is a part of China.
We can see from these tricks that China has long excluded Taiwan from the WHO due to political factors, and it can no longer justify itself. Besides, it is necessary for Beijing to remedy its international image after the resentment caused by the "Anti-Secession" Law.
In this year's meeting, China used the statements of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Meanwhile, since the WHO was also attempting to launch the International Health Regulations (IHR), our diplomatic and health agencies had to fight on two different fronts. They finally paved the way for Taiwan to take part in the IHR -- a positive result.
The WHO Constitution clearly states, "The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition." But Taiwan, after so much effort, is still unable to join the organization due to China's interference.
Although the inclusion of the principle of universal application in the IHR has opened a window of opportunity for Taiwan's participation, will it really enable the country to be involved in international health affairs and have regular contact with the WHO? We should still be cautious about irrational Chinese political interference.
It has been nine years since Taiwan launched its first bid. The legitimacy of its bid has increased after experiencing both an enterovirus epidemic and SARS. But it is undeniable that, apart from China's vicious oppression, the lack of a consensus inside Taiwan is also one of the obstacles affecting our bid.
Still, since Taiwan needs to gain support from foreign countries during this process, our diplomats have a great opportunity to develop relationships with their foreign counterparts, rather than focusing only on unilateral relationships with the US and Japan. The Department of Health (DOH) also repeatedly sent its officials to observe at WHO-related committees, and it now has a better understanding of international health cooperation.
The experience of jointly pushing for participation in the WHO has allowed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the DOH to work more closely together. The public has also realized that Taiwan should not exclude itself from the global village, and is willing to offer more medical aid to developing countries. In the future, health, democracy and business diplomacy will become the three major pillars of Taiwan's international relations.
Taiwan's frustrated bid to join the WHO was therefore not a failure. It opened up infinite possibilities for our diplomacy.
Wu Shuh-min is the president of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS