Taiwan's bid to enter the World Health Organization (WHO) failed for the ninth straight time during the World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting last month. Before the meeting, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
In this year's meeting, China changed its harsh tone, and adopted a more sophisticated method to block Taiwan's participation. During the meeting, Beijing and the WHO Secretariat signed a memorandum of understanding without Taipei's approval, painting Taiwan's bid as a "domestic" Chinese issue in order to create the false impression in the international community that Taiwan is a part of China.
We can see from these tricks that China has long excluded Taiwan from the WHO due to political factors, and it can no longer justify itself. Besides, it is necessary for Beijing to remedy its international image after the resentment caused by the "Anti-Secession" Law.
In this year's meeting, China used the statements of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Meanwhile, since the WHO was also attempting to launch the International Health Regulations (IHR), our diplomatic and health agencies had to fight on two different fronts. They finally paved the way for Taiwan to take part in the IHR -- a positive result.
The WHO Constitution clearly states, "The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition." But Taiwan, after so much effort, is still unable to join the organization due to China's interference.
Although the inclusion of the principle of universal application in the IHR has opened a window of opportunity for Taiwan's participation, will it really enable the country to be involved in international health affairs and have regular contact with the WHO? We should still be cautious about irrational Chinese political interference.
It has been nine years since Taiwan launched its first bid. The legitimacy of its bid has increased after experiencing both an enterovirus epidemic and SARS. But it is undeniable that, apart from China's vicious oppression, the lack of a consensus inside Taiwan is also one of the obstacles affecting our bid.
Still, since Taiwan needs to gain support from foreign countries during this process, our diplomats have a great opportunity to develop relationships with their foreign counterparts, rather than focusing only on unilateral relationships with the US and Japan. The Department of Health (DOH) also repeatedly sent its officials to observe at WHO-related committees, and it now has a better understanding of international health cooperation.
The experience of jointly pushing for participation in the WHO has allowed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the DOH to work more closely together. The public has also realized that Taiwan should not exclude itself from the global village, and is willing to offer more medical aid to developing countries. In the future, health, democracy and business diplomacy will become the three major pillars of Taiwan's international relations.
Taiwan's frustrated bid to join the WHO was therefore not a failure. It opened up infinite possibilities for our diplomacy.
Wu Shuh-min is the president of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS