In visiting China, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Statements made by the US State Department have generally taken an approving line about these visits, and US President George W. Bush has even suggested that Hu meet with Taiwan's legitimately elected President Chen Shui-bian (
The situation has developed in a manner that the US did not predict. This is largely due to the US' incorrect assessment of the KMT and the PFP. They believe that the KMT is still the same as it was under the two Chiangs or under Lee Teng-hui (
In order to cozy up to China, the two opposition parties have no choice but to adopt an anti-US position, for the principles and systems of the two countries are antithetical. Since the KMT lost power, its members and those of the PFP have sought to make trouble in the Taiwan-US relationship, even though Lien and Soong have not personally taken part in this process.
A constant stream of criticism has been directed at the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for relying too heavily on the US. The opposition parties have clearly shown themselves willing to sell out Taiwan, and to favor China over the US.
They have even obstructed the special arms procurement bill as a favor to China, endangering Taiwan's security and making themselves accomplices in China's expansionism.
It is unfortunate that the US government has been unaware of this. They see Taiwan's party politics as being the same as those in the US, forgetting that Taiwan's democracy is still in its infancy and that the KMT has yet to adapt itself to operating in a democratic system. Meanwhile the "China factor" is pulling the KMT toward a reliance on a dictatorial government to avoid a painful transition to democratic politics.
Now that the opposition has come out into the open about their policy to join with the CCP against Taiwan, it is only a matter of time before they make plain that they will join with the CCP against the US as well. The US needs to realize this.
Fortunately, the US is not totally unaware of the problem. Congress is monitoring the situation and has adopted some measures in response.
Representative Henry Hyde, chairman of the US House Committee on International Relations and 33 other members of Congress signed a strongly worded letter to Lien asking him to support the passage of the arms procurement bill that is currently being held up in the legislature.
Second, the US Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act requesting more latitude regarding the rank of military officers permitted to visit Taiwan. Currently, serving generals and deputy assistant secretaries of defense and above may not visit Taiwan.
Third, the US House Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights and International Operations approved an amendment in the 2006/2007 National Defense Authorization Act to allow the legitimately elected leader of Taiwan to visit the US without restrictions. This article states that direct contact with Taiwan's legitimate leaders including the president, vice-president, foreign minister and defense minister are beneficial to US interests.
Regarding arms procurement, American Institute in Taiwan Director Douglas Paal invited the three conveners of the legislature's National Defense Committee to discuss the issue privately, but his invitation has already been refused by some of those invited. After all, the pan-blue camp has only just "broken the ice" with China. If they passed the arms procurement bill at the US' request, wouldn't all their effort to cozy up to China come to nothing?
As to the letter from the 33 US Congress members, the KMT has simply sought to avoid the issue. Prior to categorically turning against the US, they clearly want to keep up appearances.
As for the second and third proposals, these are a long way from being formal policy, but their significance should not be totally discounted. For the sake of US interests and world peace, this is clearly the way to go.
This could even be taken one step further: The three outdated joint US-China communiques could be discussed to free up US policy in the Taiwan Strait and allow it to introduce more necessary measures.
For example, if the US were to elevate Taiwan's international status as a means to counter China, and if other countries followed suit, this would greatly assist in ensuring peace in the Strait.
Ultimately, in the battle between democratic Taiwan and tyrannical China, the US should not see itself as a referee, but should actively take sides and participate.
Paul Lin is a freelance writer based in New York.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS