Taiwan has been through a lot lately. It started with China's "Anti-Secession" Law, which threatens Taiwan with attack if Beijing thinks Taipei is heading toward independence. As if this wasn't enough drama, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) further enlivened proceedings with their separate visits to China, where they were given a hero's welcome, so to speak. And why not? It suited Beijing pretty well.
The visits firstly exposed the disunity of Taiwan's political class on the vital issue of the nation's future. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is inclined to favor independence, the KMT and the PFP are for eventual unification with China. It is a great opportunity for Beijing to promote and exploit this disunity. The visits of the two chairmen were, therefore, a bonanza, coming so soon after the passage of the Anti-Secession Law.
Second, it reinforces the Chinese leadership's belief that the majority of Taiwan's people are for unification, whether or not this is borne out by election results or popular surveys.
Third, Lien's and Soong's visits enabled China to play to the international gallery regarding the presumed support for unification in Taiwan.
Fourth, it might marginalize the US role on the Taiwan question. Beijing has now demonstrated a capacity to subvert Taiwan's body politic, making it look like a divided nation.
Where does Taiwan go from here? The obvious answer is that it should continue with business as usual. In a way the National Assembly elections underlined this. Despite all the hype from the China visits, Beijing cannot derive any satisfaction from the results. The ruling party improved its position both in terms of votes polled and seats won.
The 300-member assembly will sit for one month to approve electoral reforms already enacted by the legislature. It will also make constitutional amendments subject to approval by referendum after being enacted by the legislature.
The lower voter turnout of about 23 percent was disappointing, suggesting a level of popular disengagement with the country's politics. There is a message here for Taiwan's political establishment, which is that the voters want results and not theatrics. Therefore, diversions like trips to China by opposition leaders do not seem to have much impact.
Beijing will not be able to play up the Taiwan opposition card every time. Now that the drama of the visits is over, if Beijing is interested in taking the political process further, it will have no choice but to deal with President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) government.
Will Beijing be interested? Not if one goes by its previous signals. The official position remains that Beijing would talk with Taipei only on the basis of the "one China" formula. Therefore, the DPP must scrap its party platform and forsake its "separatist activities." Which means that Beijing will continue to subvert Taiwan's polity.
Lien seems to believe that his visit, and the dialogue he initiated, "has presented to our people a viable alternative, a viable choice in our relations with China." He has obviously not explored, and probably will never get to explore, whether Beijing would agree to the perpetuation of the status quo (subject to the "one China" provision) for a long or undefined period.
The best China has to offer is the Hong Kong formula of "one country, two systems." And the way it is working there is hardly a shining example of what Taiwan might get into under that system. Even Taiwan's opposition might have difficulty swallowing it. In other words, China is tactically exploiting Taiwan's divided polity, knowing fully that its dialogue with Taiwan's opposition leaders is just a game played to put Chen on the defensive.
The point is that Chen doesn't have to be on the defensive. He still has three years in office. It is said that a week is a long time in politics. By this standard three years should be like eternity. It is unlikely that China is going to do something silly like attack Taiwan in the near future, notwithstanding its recently-enacted Anti-Secession Law. This has already complicated its position with the EU over the arms export ban imposed after the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. The EU has decided to keep the ban.
In all likelihood China will follow its old strategy of keeping up the military and psychological pressure, and subverting Taiwan's political landscape. It is the last which looks promising to China in the wake of Lien's and Soong's visits. Beijing will work on it for some time to come. But the next presidential elections are not due till 2008. The DPP, therefore, has enough time to counter that strategy.
Will China be able to marginalize the US by manipulating and subverting Taiwan's internal polity? It would seem highly unlikely. Taiwan's opposition leaders do not seem to be casting themselves as Beijing's proxy vis-a-vis the US. Indeed, it is believed that US-Taiwan relations have suffered under Chen because of his pro-independence politics.
Taiwan's opposition leaders might, therefore, feel that their pro-status quo politics are favored by Washington. The US is not against the opposition leaders' dialogue with Beijing. It has, however, urged China to start a dialogue with Taiwan's elected government for substantive results.
Therefore, even though Beijing might like to sideline the US it is unlikely to happen, as US support is vital for Taiwan's entire political class, across the board. At the end of the day, Taiwan's political parties have to work out their internal differences among themselves. And they should be focusing on that.
Sushil Seth is a writer based in Australia.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS