Since Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
On the first day that candidates could register for the KMT chairmanship election, the party's central standing committee met. Most importantly, all 22 members of the committee, led by KMT Vice Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤), enthusiastically signed a petition calling for Lien to stay on as chairman and made speeches predicting that the party will split unless he does. The scene outside the meeting was even more outrageous, with people kneeling down and chanting "Brother Lien save the KMT" while chastising Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) for his candidacy and calling him a "betrayer of the nation."
It seemed as if the white sun would drop out of the blue sky without Lien, while it was immoral of Ma to stand for election. Furthermore, Lien said that he had "taken to heart" what Formosa Plastics chairman Wang Yung-ching (
KMT Legislator Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has said that Lien told him "there is no way" he will stay on. Giving Wu a figurative slap in the face while also refuting this rumor, Ting Yuan-chao (丁遠超), director of Lien's office, retorted that none of the multitude of statements regarding Lien's plans counted for anything.
But are statements by a spokesperson "official"? Following comments at a press conference by KMT Central Standing Committee Spokeswoman Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), some media outlets reported that Lien is not standing for re-election. Immediately after that, Lien's henchman and KMT spokesman Chang Jung-kung (張榮恭) immediately criticized the reports for being "one-sided." So will Lien stand for election, or won't he? We now see that considerations of "personal wishes" have nothing to do with it.
The biggest stumbling block to Lien's staying on is Ma's unwavering determination to stand for election. This is also the reason for Lien's attack on Ma during the Central Standing Committee meeting, when Lien asked, "In what direction will the party develop following the election? Will it have the guts to oppose those actions of the populist government that should be opposed? Or demonstrate when a demonstration is called for? Will it take the necessary steps?" What is this, if not a settling of accounts for Ma's earlier lack of enthusiasm for "demonstrating against losing the election"? Even more clearly, Lien criticized Ma, saying that the party had "lost its ideals" and that "I cannot accept such statements."
Since Lien is not standing for re-election, is it necessary for him to announce his political opinions? Must he attack Ma to protect the KMT vote? Most crucially, Lien has "ordered" Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and Ma to inform the Central Standing Committee about the party's future direction and development, saying that "if not everyone is happy, further negotiations can be held" and "if problems remain unresolved, I will consider joint negotiations."
With Lien first attacking Ma for everyone to see, it is pretty obvious what his "concerns" and "joint negotiations" are all about. The problem is that Ma is determined to follow through with his candidacy regardless of what Lien says. Who said that elections aren't everything?
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS