Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) has made plain that he will not invite President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to China unless Chen first agrees to Beijing's "one China" policy. That precondition is an oxymoron.
Under the "one China" policy, Chen is already in China. You don't need a visa to go where you already are. Hu's refusal to allow Chen into China amounts to an endorsement of Chen's policy of "one Strait, two countries."
That little problem aside, it isn't really necessary for Chen to go to China to give a speech. He can speak to the Chinese people from behind his desk at Ketagalan Avenue.
Chen's speech should be diplomatic, in order to assert popular sovereignty, while exuding goodwill and respecting the aspirations of all Chinese-speaking peoples. May I recommend a few lines for that speech?
Chairman Hu, members of the Communist Party, ladies and gentlemen of China:
Jiou he bi fen; jiou fen bi he (
The couplet that opens and closes The Romance of Three Kingdoms is familiar to anyone who has studied Chinese history. The eight characters express the history of China, the way of the world and the will of heaven. It can best be rendered as "empires wax and wane; states are rent asunder and coalesce."
Government leaders rule best by serving; and, by serving, enjoy the mandate of heaven. Wise rulers rule benevolently; the wisest rulers rule invisibly. Government leaders secure the safety and happiness of the people they serve, and enjoy the mandate of heaven as long as they serve in this manner.
Recently, the Republic of China (ROC) held elections for the National Assembly, and talk of referenda and constitutional change are in the air. In the interest of peace across the Taiwan Strait, we must respect the aspirations of Chinese-speaking people everywhere.
The Constitution by which Taiwan is presently governed claims that the ROC governs the people of China, which, clearly, is not the case. At the same time, since the Constitution was ratified while Taiwan was a part of Japan, the ROC Constitution forbids the ROC from governing Taiwan; which, in fact, is almost the only spot of ground on earth that the ROC actually does govern. No one in his right mind can take seriously a constitution that claims powers it cannot exercise and forbids it to exercise the only powers it is capable of exercising.
Our new constitution will not claim that Taiwan is independent of China. But while many are impatient for unification, many Taiwanese are also impatient for Taiwan to formally separate from China.
But one thing can be agreed on. Both sides face an immense task, and our means of aiding it so feeble; the life of a man is so short, and the life of mankind is so long, that we may see only the ebb of advancing ways and are thus discouraged. It is history that teaches us to hope.
And what do we see in the history of China?
Empires wax and wane; states are rent asunder and coalesce. It is the history of China, the way of the world, and the will of heaven.
Jerry Mills
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS