Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) has made plain that he will not invite President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to China unless Chen first agrees to Beijing's "one China" policy. That precondition is an oxymoron.
Under the "one China" policy, Chen is already in China. You don't need a visa to go where you already are. Hu's refusal to allow Chen into China amounts to an endorsement of Chen's policy of "one Strait, two countries."
That little problem aside, it isn't really necessary for Chen to go to China to give a speech. He can speak to the Chinese people from behind his desk at Ketagalan Avenue.
Chen's speech should be diplomatic, in order to assert popular sovereignty, while exuding goodwill and respecting the aspirations of all Chinese-speaking peoples. May I recommend a few lines for that speech?
Chairman Hu, members of the Communist Party, ladies and gentlemen of China:
Jiou he bi fen; jiou fen bi he (
The couplet that opens and closes The Romance of Three Kingdoms is familiar to anyone who has studied Chinese history. The eight characters express the history of China, the way of the world and the will of heaven. It can best be rendered as "empires wax and wane; states are rent asunder and coalesce."
Government leaders rule best by serving; and, by serving, enjoy the mandate of heaven. Wise rulers rule benevolently; the wisest rulers rule invisibly. Government leaders secure the safety and happiness of the people they serve, and enjoy the mandate of heaven as long as they serve in this manner.
Recently, the Republic of China (ROC) held elections for the National Assembly, and talk of referenda and constitutional change are in the air. In the interest of peace across the Taiwan Strait, we must respect the aspirations of Chinese-speaking people everywhere.
The Constitution by which Taiwan is presently governed claims that the ROC governs the people of China, which, clearly, is not the case. At the same time, since the Constitution was ratified while Taiwan was a part of Japan, the ROC Constitution forbids the ROC from governing Taiwan; which, in fact, is almost the only spot of ground on earth that the ROC actually does govern. No one in his right mind can take seriously a constitution that claims powers it cannot exercise and forbids it to exercise the only powers it is capable of exercising.
Our new constitution will not claim that Taiwan is independent of China. But while many are impatient for unification, many Taiwanese are also impatient for Taiwan to formally separate from China.
But one thing can be agreed on. Both sides face an immense task, and our means of aiding it so feeble; the life of a man is so short, and the life of mankind is so long, that we may see only the ebb of advancing ways and are thus discouraged. It is history that teaches us to hope.
And what do we see in the history of China?
Empires wax and wane; states are rent asunder and coalesce. It is the history of China, the way of the world, and the will of heaven.
Jerry Mills
Taipei
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS