During the last meeting of the legislature's Procedure Committee, the legislative caucuses of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) again forcefully blocked the placement of the arms procurement budget and nominations of Control Yuan members on the deliberation and review agenda. As a result, these two bills, the focus of much public attention in Taiwan, were again kept from being included on the list of topics to be deliberated on the legislative floor, causing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to withdraw from the meeting in protest.
The balance between the military powers on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is rapidly tipping toward China, as that country increases its missile deployment against Taiwan. The need for Taiwan to strengthen its self-defense capabilities can wait no longer. However, the budget for the arms procurement was blocked again for the 24th time by the pan-blue camp and therefore deprived of even the opportunity to be reviewed and deliberated in the Legislative Yuan.
Obviously, some reasons cited by the pan-blues for blocking the bill are superficial at most. The real problem more than likely rests with the divided national identification and the pan-blue camp's resentment of President Chen Shui-bian (
After the election of the National Assembly members, the DPP had an internal debate over the party's direction. The concept of "reconciliation for co-existence" proposed by Premier Frank Hsieh (
Frankly speaking, under normal circumstances, the idea of reconciliation not only should not become the target of scrutiny and critique, but in fact should be positively recognized. However, politics are a highly realistic art. Roles and scripts staged in the political forum reflect the highly complicated characteristics of human nature and conflicts between ideals and reality. Therefore, the implementation of reconciliation in Taiwan's political forum requires consideration about the practical difficulties.
In other words, the differences between the pan-blue and pan-green camps over national identification must be recognized. From the pan-blues' viewpoint, this difference is no longer an internal contradiction within a country but a clash between enemies. Therefore, on topics that touch upon national identification and ideologies, they would rather sing in chorus with China from this side of the Taiwan Strait than resolve their differences and shake hands to make peace with the Chen government.
If anyone within the ruling party continues to hold a shred of illusion about reconciliation, it is about time to wake up and smell the coffee over what had again transpired in the Legislative Yuan's procedure committee.
It is no exaggeration to say that the pan-blue camp sees the rivalry with the pan-greens as confrontations with the enemy. The fact that the budget for arms procurement has been blocked repeatedly is pretty much self-explanatory.
First, while reports appraising the military strengths of the two sides of the Strait may otherwise differ in substantive content or underlying standpoints, one conclusion has been uniformly reached -- that is, if Taiwan does not strengthen its military capabilities, such as by acquiring arms included in the arms-procurement plan in question, then Taiwan's advantage in military strength will be gone within a few years. In contrast with the annual decrease in the percentage of GNP dedicated to Taiwan's military defense budget, the Chinese national defense budget has been increasing by two-digit percentage points each year, strengthening its ability to strike at Taiwan by the year.
After China enacted the "Anti-Secession" Law, making explicit its intention to deal with Taiwan in a non-peaceful manner, Japan and the EU began to feel alarmed by the rising threats posed by China to peace and order throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
However, it is puzzling why, at a time when the international community is seriously worrying about Taiwan's safety, when the US and Japan are strengthening their military alliance and now include the security of the Taiwan Strait in their common strategic goals, and when the majority of EU countries strongly oppose the lifting of the union's arms embargo against China, the pan-blue camp continues to block reviewing of the budget for arms procurement.
What a total disregard of the security of the 23 million people in Taiwan. The absurdity is this -- the pan-blue camp claims that what it opposes is "wasteful spending," paying for the purchase through a special budget as well as certain items to be purchased, rather than arms purchases per se. KMT spokesperson Chang Jung-kung (
However, it is precisely because of the divergent views between the ruling and opposition camps that there is a real need to submit the budget for legislative review and deliberation, so that the opinions and viewpoints of all the parties and groups can be fully communicated and expressed.
In particular, the three major items of arms to be purchased were proposed during the era of the KMT's reign. At the time, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Lien and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) paid a visit to China, respectively, helping China to create the illusion of peace. Their behavior has not only helped China relieve mounting international pressure but also deluded the international community. After Lien and Soong dined and wined with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and returned to Taiwan, they continued to block the arms-purchase budget. Is it because the pan blues are naive enough to believe that their visits to China were enough to ensure peace? Or perhaps that there is something going on between the other side of the Taiwan Strait and the pan-blue camp that cannot be made public? This is indeed worth pondering.
Actually, in the communiques issued and talks held between Hu and the two chairmen, there may seem to be a lot of so-called "consensuses" as well as "flowery talk" all over the place. However, China went on to oppose Taiwan's observer status in the World Health Assembly. Everything tells us that the so-called agreements reached between the pan-blues and China are nothing but lies and empty talk.
The people of Taiwan most definitely should not underestimate the situation or do any wishful thinking about the unification propaganda wielded by Beijing to cosy up to the opposition leaders of Taiwan. The only way to ensure national security is through strengthening defense capabilities and being prepared for war. The pan-blues should seriously think about the safety of the 23 million people in Taiwan. Do not block the purchase of these arms any longer!
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS