Minister of National Defense Lee Jye (
Opinion surveys show that over 70 percent of people in this country support the military's procurement plan. That the pan-blue camp is ignoring the wishes of the people in pursuing its boycott of the bill is intolerable.
If the pan-blue camp objects to specific items in the bill, it can propose deleting those items. If it object to the price, it can request an adjustment. To obstruct the bill as a whole is simply to jeopardize the safety of the nation for political reasons. This is unreasonable and unacceptable behavior for the legislature of a democratic nation.
If the obstruction was simply to curry favor with China, then it should be possible to return to the debate over arms procurement now that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
The political parties may well have different opinions on the unification-independence question and other cross-strait issues. But the arms-procurement bill transcends this debate. The pan-blue parties believe that negotiations are the best way to secure peace and stability. However, if Taiwan is left without the means to defend itself, it will have nothing to bargain with. For this reason, these military purchases are essential. They are a precondition to cross-strait negotiations.
If the two sides of the Taiwan Strait cannot enter into negotiations in the short term, and the "cold peace" continues to drag out, military preparedness is even more important. Both the US military and the Ministry of National Defense are concerned that if the procurement bill is not passed, there will be a severe imbalance in military strength before 2008. This is especially the case now that Beijing has passed its "Anti-Secession" Law to legitimize the use of force against this country.
China might at any time seek to use "non-peaceful means" to resolve the cross-strait issue, and any imbalance in naval strength is only likely to encourage Beijing to take this option. If the procurement bill does not pass, it is likely that this nation will find itself unable even to maintain the status quo in the Strait.
With just about a week left in the current session of the legislature, the procurement bill should be given priority. Lee has said that if the legislature is willing to debate the issue, the procurement budget could be cut to just NT$300 billion (US$9.53 billion) or NT$350 billion. And even if other budgetary requirements need to be postponed, arms procurement should be given priority. As far as national security is concerned, the price of the arms is not important. Rather, it is a question of value.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS