Minister of National Defense Lee Jye (
Opinion surveys show that over 70 percent of people in this country support the military's procurement plan. That the pan-blue camp is ignoring the wishes of the people in pursuing its boycott of the bill is intolerable.
If the pan-blue camp objects to specific items in the bill, it can propose deleting those items. If it object to the price, it can request an adjustment. To obstruct the bill as a whole is simply to jeopardize the safety of the nation for political reasons. This is unreasonable and unacceptable behavior for the legislature of a democratic nation.
If the obstruction was simply to curry favor with China, then it should be possible to return to the debate over arms procurement now that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
The political parties may well have different opinions on the unification-independence question and other cross-strait issues. But the arms-procurement bill transcends this debate. The pan-blue parties believe that negotiations are the best way to secure peace and stability. However, if Taiwan is left without the means to defend itself, it will have nothing to bargain with. For this reason, these military purchases are essential. They are a precondition to cross-strait negotiations.
If the two sides of the Taiwan Strait cannot enter into negotiations in the short term, and the "cold peace" continues to drag out, military preparedness is even more important. Both the US military and the Ministry of National Defense are concerned that if the procurement bill is not passed, there will be a severe imbalance in military strength before 2008. This is especially the case now that Beijing has passed its "Anti-Secession" Law to legitimize the use of force against this country.
China might at any time seek to use "non-peaceful means" to resolve the cross-strait issue, and any imbalance in naval strength is only likely to encourage Beijing to take this option. If the procurement bill does not pass, it is likely that this nation will find itself unable even to maintain the status quo in the Strait.
With just about a week left in the current session of the legislature, the procurement bill should be given priority. Lee has said that if the legislature is willing to debate the issue, the procurement budget could be cut to just NT$300 billion (US$9.53 billion) or NT$350 billion. And even if other budgetary requirements need to be postponed, arms procurement should be given priority. As far as national security is concerned, the price of the arms is not important. Rather, it is a question of value.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS