Minister of National Defense Lee Jye (
Opinion surveys show that over 70 percent of people in this country support the military's procurement plan. That the pan-blue camp is ignoring the wishes of the people in pursuing its boycott of the bill is intolerable.
If the pan-blue camp objects to specific items in the bill, it can propose deleting those items. If it object to the price, it can request an adjustment. To obstruct the bill as a whole is simply to jeopardize the safety of the nation for political reasons. This is unreasonable and unacceptable behavior for the legislature of a democratic nation.
If the obstruction was simply to curry favor with China, then it should be possible to return to the debate over arms procurement now that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
The political parties may well have different opinions on the unification-independence question and other cross-strait issues. But the arms-procurement bill transcends this debate. The pan-blue parties believe that negotiations are the best way to secure peace and stability. However, if Taiwan is left without the means to defend itself, it will have nothing to bargain with. For this reason, these military purchases are essential. They are a precondition to cross-strait negotiations.
If the two sides of the Taiwan Strait cannot enter into negotiations in the short term, and the "cold peace" continues to drag out, military preparedness is even more important. Both the US military and the Ministry of National Defense are concerned that if the procurement bill is not passed, there will be a severe imbalance in military strength before 2008. This is especially the case now that Beijing has passed its "Anti-Secession" Law to legitimize the use of force against this country.
China might at any time seek to use "non-peaceful means" to resolve the cross-strait issue, and any imbalance in naval strength is only likely to encourage Beijing to take this option. If the procurement bill does not pass, it is likely that this nation will find itself unable even to maintain the status quo in the Strait.
With just about a week left in the current session of the legislature, the procurement bill should be given priority. Lee has said that if the legislature is willing to debate the issue, the procurement budget could be cut to just NT$300 billion (US$9.53 billion) or NT$350 billion. And even if other budgetary requirements need to be postponed, arms procurement should be given priority. As far as national security is concerned, the price of the arms is not important. Rather, it is a question of value.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS